These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21162452)

  • 21. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hazard perception as a function of target location and the field of view.
    Shahar A; Alberti CF; Clarke D; Crundall D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1577-84. PubMed ID: 20728606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
    Larsson P; Niemand M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Examining the effects of an eco-driving message on driver distraction.
    Rouzikhah H; King M; Rakotonirainy A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():975-83. PubMed ID: 22910188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of advertising billboards during simulated driving.
    Edquist J; Horberry T; Hosking S; Johnston I
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):619-26. PubMed ID: 20864087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of stimulus modality on signal detection: implications for assessing the safety of in-vehicle technology.
    Merat N; Jamson AH
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 18354978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Route familiarity breeds inattention: a driving simulator study.
    Yanko MR; Spalek TM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Aug; 57():80-6. PubMed ID: 23643937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Driving with distraction in Parkinson disease.
    Uc EY; Rizzo M; Anderson SW; Sparks JD; Rodnitzky RL; Dawson JD
    Neurology; 2006 Nov; 67(10):1774-80. PubMed ID: 17130409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):785-804. PubMed ID: 17240725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems.
    Liu YC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Mar; 44(4):425-42. PubMed ID: 11291824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Garabet A
    J Safety Res; 2009; 40(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19285580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scrolling and driving: how an MP3 player and its aftermarket controller affect driving performance and visual behavior.
    Lee JD; Roberts SC; Hoffman JD; Angell LS
    Hum Factors; 2012 Apr; 54(2):250-63. PubMed ID: 22624291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Alpha spindles as neurophysiological correlates indicating attentional shift in a simulated driving task.
    Sonnleitner A; Simon M; Kincses WE; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 22094045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles.
    Jakus G; Dicke C; Sodnik J
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():184-92. PubMed ID: 25151313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mitigating the effects of in-vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm.
    Hibberd DL; Jamson SL; Carsten OM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1096-103. PubMed ID: 22999382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.