These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21163472)

  • 1. Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?
    Velan H; Frost R
    Cognition; 2011 Feb; 118(2):141-56. PubMed ID: 21163472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are root letters compulsory for lexical access in Semitic languages? The case of masked form-priming in Arabic.
    Perea M; Mallouh RA; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):491-500. PubMed ID: 24954309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language.
    Frost R; Kugler T; Deutsch A; Forster KI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1293-326. PubMed ID: 16393048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew.
    Velan H; Frost R
    J Mem Lang; 2009 Oct; 61(3):285-302. PubMed ID: 20161017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of the root in auditory word recognition of Hebrew.
    Oganyan M; Wright R; Herschensohn J
    Cortex; 2019 Jul; 116():286-293. PubMed ID: 30037635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are all Semitic languages immune to letter transpositions? The case of Maltese.
    Perea M; Gatt A; Moret-Tatay C; Fabri R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):942-7. PubMed ID: 22669840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of consonants and vowels to auditory word recognition is shaped by language-specific properties: Evidence from Hebrew.
    Lador-Weizman Y; Deutsch A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):401-426. PubMed ID: 35377703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew.
    Velan H; Deutsch A; Frost R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1143-52. PubMed ID: 23398257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does visual letter similarity modulate masked form priming in young readers of Arabic?
    Perea M; Abu Mallouh R; Mohammed A; Khalifa B; Carreiras M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 May; 169():110-117. PubMed ID: 29357989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transposed-letter priming effect in Hebrew in the same-different task.
    Kinoshita S; Norris D; Siegelman N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1296-305. PubMed ID: 22494148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: evidence from Hebrew.
    Feldman LB; Bentin S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 May; 47(2):407-35. PubMed ID: 8036270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Universal and particular in morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew.
    Farhy Y; Veríssimo J; Clahsen H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 28335663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task.
    Boudelaa S; Norris D; Mahfoudhi A; Kinoshita S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):729-757. PubMed ID: 31120301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: the impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew.
    Velan H; Frost R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):913-8. PubMed ID: 18087959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Form of Morphemes: MEG Evidence From Masked Priming of Two Hebrew Templates.
    Kastner I; Pylkkänen L; Marantz A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2163. PubMed ID: 30483184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Role of Emergent Bilingualism in the Development of Morphological Awareness in Arabic and Hebrew.
    Schwartz M; Taha H; Assad H; Khamaisi F; Eviatar Z
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):797-809. PubMed ID: 27561115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do both WRAP and TRAP inhibit the recognition of the French word DRAP? Impact of orthographic markedness on cross-language orthographic priming.
    Commissaire E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1094-1113. PubMed ID: 34523377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A developmental study of eye movements in Hebrew word reading: the effects of word familiarity, word length, and reading proficiency.
    Lahoud H; Share DL; Shechter A
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1052755. PubMed ID: 37484068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Letter connectedness and Arabic visual word recognition.
    Alluhaybi I; Witzel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1660-1674. PubMed ID: 32345128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic Effects in Morphological Priming: The Case of Hebrew Stems.
    Farhy Y; Veríssimo J
    Lang Speech; 2019 Dec; 62(4):737-750. PubMed ID: 30501377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.