These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21163494)
1. Improvement and limitation of the reliability of automated QT measurement by recent algorithms. Tyl B; Azzam S; Blanco N; Wheeler W J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 21163494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Man versus machine: is there an optimal method for QT measurements in thorough QT studies? Darpo B; Agin M; Kazierad DJ; Layton G; Muirhead G; Gray P; Jorkasky DK J Clin Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 46(6):598-612. PubMed ID: 16707406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ventricular late potentials studied by high-amplitude electrocardiography in relation to the length of the QT interval]. Guţiu I; Leheuzey JY; Lavergne T; Guize L; Peronneau P Rom J Intern Med; 1992; 30(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 1496267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 5 methods of QT interval measurements on electrocardiograms from a thorough QT/QTc study: effect on assay sensitivity and categorical outliers. Salvi V; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Natekar M; Hingorani P; Kerkar V; Ramasamy A; de Vries M; Zumbrunnen T; Kothari S; Narula D J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21238976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pattern recognition analysis of digital ECGs: decreased QT measurement error and improved precision compared to semi-automated methods. Meyer O; Ferber G; Greig G; Holzgrefe HH J Electrocardiol; 2013; 46(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 23266069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semiautomated QT interval measurement in electrocardiograms from a thorough QT study: comparison of the grouped and ungrouped superimposed median beat methods. Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Ramasamy A; Panicker GK; Salvi V; Bhoir H; Kothari S J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 22364647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of manual and automated measurements of the QT interval in healthy volunteers: an analysis of five thorough QT studies. Fosser C; Duczynski G; Agin M; Wicker P; Darpo B Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Nov; 86(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 19339965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two automatic QT algorithms compared with manual measurement in identification of long QT syndrome. Diamant UB; Winbo A; Stattin EL; Rydberg A; Kesek M; Jensen SM J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20005993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of QT interval measurement by advanced electrocardiographic equipment. Hnatkova K; Gang Y; Batchvarov VN; Malik M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1277-84. PubMed ID: 17100684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of methodological differences in digital electrocardiogram interval measurement. Badilini F; Sarapa N J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S152-6. PubMed ID: 16920141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An algorithm for QT interval monitoring in neonatal intensive care units. Helfenbein ED; Ackerman MJ; Rautaharju PM; Zhou SH; Gregg RE; Lindauer JM; Miller D; Wang JJ; Kresge SS; Babaeizadeh S; Feild DQ; Michaud FP J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6 Suppl):S103-10. PubMed ID: 17993306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The "thorough QT study": a valid paradigm to test new algorithms for QT interval measurements? Badilini F J Electrocardiol; 2013; 46(2):126-7. PubMed ID: 23352745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Time to replace Bazett's QT-correction. Woosley RL; Romero K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Nov; 32(11):1379-80. PubMed ID: 19712074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of automated interval measurements by widely used algorithms in digital electrocardiographs. Kligfield P; Badilini F; Denjoy I; Babaeizadeh S; Clark E; De Bie J; Devine B; Extramiana F; Generali G; Gregg R; Helfenbein E; Kors J; Leber R; Macfarlane P; Maison-Blanche P; Rowlandson I; Schmid R; Vaglio M; van Herpen G; Xue J; Young B; Green CL Am Heart J; 2018 Jun; 200():1-10. PubMed ID: 29898835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An algorithm for continuous real-time QT interval monitoring. Helfenbein ED; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Field DQ; Gregg RE; Wang JJ; Kresge SS; Michaud FP J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S123-7. PubMed ID: 16920145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation. Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heart rate dependence of the QT interval duration: differences among congenital long QT syndrome subtypes. Nemec J; Buncová M; Bůlková V; Hejlik J; Winter B; Shen WK; Ackerman MJ J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 15(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 15149424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. QT interval variability and adaptation to heart rate changes in patients with long QT syndrome. Nemec J; Buncová M; Shusterman V; Winter B; Shen WK; Ackerman MJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 19140916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of the upper limit of the reference value of the QT interval in rest electrocardiograms in healthy young Japanese men using the bootstrap method. Goto H; Mamorita N; Ikeda N; Miyahara H J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):703.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18954612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]