These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21165184)

  • 1. Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework.
    Lee HJ; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Choi JH; Kim MJ
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2010 Mar; 2(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21165184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
    Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ; Pesun IJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Implant Angulation and Depth on the Accuracy of Casts Using the Open Tray Splinted Impression Technique.
    Taduri T; Mathur S; Upadhyay S; Patel K; Shah M
    J Oral Implantol; 2021 Dec; 47(6):447-454. PubMed ID: 33270885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of accuracy of various impression techniques and impression materials in recording multiple implants placed unilaterally in a partially edentulous mandible- An
    Parameshwari G; Chittaranjan B; Sudhir N; Anulekha-Avinash CK; Taruna M; Ramureddy M
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Apr; 10(4):e388-e395. PubMed ID: 29750102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap.
    Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Dalili Kajan Z
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2017 Dec; 18(4):289-297. PubMed ID: 29201973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant impression accuracy of parallel and non-parallel implants: a comparative in-vitro analysis of open and closed tray techniques.
    Osman MS; Ziada HM; Abubakr NH; Suliman AM
    Int J Implant Dent; 2019 Feb; 5(1):4. PubMed ID: 30778790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of different definitive impression techniques with the all-on-4 protocol.
    Ozan O; Hamis O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):941-948. PubMed ID: 30661881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of implant angulation and impression technique on impressions of NobelActive implants.
    Alexander Hazboun GB; Masri R; Romberg E; Kempler J; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 25749089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Impression Techniques with Maxillary Angled Implants Using Trays and Multifunctional Guides.
    de Souza Bezerra Araújo RF; Oliveira LP; Arioli Filho JN; de Assis Mollo Júnior F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):530-537. PubMed ID: 34115068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Different Impression Techniques When Using the All-on-Four Implant Treatment Protocol.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Beyabanaki E; Rahimian S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 27148987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials.
    De La Cruz JE; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Moss ME; Graser GN; Tallents RH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 12426505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Effect of Implant Angulation and Implant Number on the Dimensional Accuracy of Definitive Casts.
    Kaur G; Baweja PS; Saini RS; Singh IP; Sharma T; Singh S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):394-399. PubMed ID: 34267009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.
    Liu DY; Cader FN; Abduo J; Palamara J
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e682-e687. PubMed ID: 29286181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Implant Impression Approach: A Three-Dimensional Comparative In Vitro Analysis.
    Basaki K; Alkumru H; De Souza G; Finer Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):792–799. PubMed ID: 28618432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.