179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21165264)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of dental implants with different surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits.
Koh JW; Yang JH; Han JS; Lee JB; Kim SH
J Adv Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 1(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 21165264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
Lee JT; Cho SA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly-L-DL-lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study in sheep.
Stübinger S; Waser J; Hefti T; Drechsler A; Sidler M; Klein K; von Rechenberg B; Schlottig F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):572-80. PubMed ID: 24989873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative in vivo study of alloy titanium implants with two different surfaces: biomechanical and SEM analysis.
Souza FÁ; Furtado TSM; Dayube URC; Melo WM; Nishioka RS; Poli PP; Maiorana C; de Carvalho PSP
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4383-4397. PubMed ID: 30972600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thermal oxidation and hydrofluoric acid treatment on the sandblasted implant surface: A histologic histomorphometric and biomechanical study.
Qamheya AHA; Arısan V; Mutlu Z; Karabaglı M; Soluk Tekkeşin M; Kara K; Erol A; Ersanlı S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):741-755. PubMed ID: 29876965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
Ernst S; Stübinger S; Schüpbach P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Schätzle M; Männchen R; Balbach U; Hämmerle CH; Toutenburg H; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 19302392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical measurements of calcium-incorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implant.
Sul YT; Byon ES; Jeong Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 15669710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of osseointegration on various implant surfaces after bacterial contamination and cleaning: a rabbit study.
Yuan K; Chan YJ; Kung KC; Lee TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 24451851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A resonance frequency analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched implants with different diameters: a prospective clinical study during the initial healing period.
Kim HJ; Kim YK; Joo JY; Lee JY
J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2017 Apr; 47(2):106-115. PubMed ID: 28462009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of a Hydrophilic Dental Implant Surface on Osseointegration: Biomechanical Results in Rabbit.
Jinno Y; Stocchero M; Galli S; Toia M; Becktor JP
J Oral Implantol; 2021 Apr; 47(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 32663272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants.
Dos Santos MV; Elias CN; Cavalcanti Lima JH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 19744197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit.
Klokkevold PR; Johnson P; Dadgostari S; Caputo A; Davies JE; Nishimura RD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Aug; 12(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 11488864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resonance Frequency Analysis of Thermal Acid-Etched, Hydrophilic Implants During First 3 Months of Healing and Osseointegration in an Early-Loading Protocol.
van Eekeren P; Said C; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):843-50. PubMed ID: 26252037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
