These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21166136)

  • 21. Establishing auditory steady-state response thresholds to narrow band CE-chirps(®) in full-term neonates.
    Rodrigues GR; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 78(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 24332609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of hearing loss in children: comparison of auditory steady-state response, auditory brainstem response, and behavioral test methods.
    Stueve MP; O'Rourke C
    Am J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 12(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 14964328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children.
    Luts H; Desloovere C; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 16219992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Latencies of auditory steady-state responses recorded in early infancy.
    Alaerts J; Luts H; Van Dun B; Desloovere C; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 19657187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry.
    Scherf F; Brokx J; Wuyts FL; Van de Heyning PH
    Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 16717018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
    Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Refining the audiological assessment in children using narrow-band CE-Chirp-evoked auditory steady state responses.
    Venail F; Artaud JP; Blanchet C; Uziel A; Mondain M
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 25036002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The clinical application status and progression of auditory steady-state evoked response].
    Chen Y; Song JS
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 31(23):1854-1857. PubMed ID: 29798404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications.
    Canale A; Lacilla M; Cavalot AL; Albera R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 263(6):499-503. PubMed ID: 16557415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The clinical value of the multiple-frequency 80-Hz auditory steady-state response in adults with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    D'haenens W; Dhooge I; Maes L; Bockstael A; Keppler H; Philips B; Swinnen F; Vinck BM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 135(5):496-506. PubMed ID: 19451472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection and differentiation of sensorineural hearing loss in mice using auditory steady-state responses and transient auditory brainstem responses.
    Pauli-Magnus D; Hoch G; Strenzke N; Anderson S; Jentsch TJ; Moser T
    Neuroscience; 2007 Nov; 149(3):673-84. PubMed ID: 17869440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise-exposed workers.
    Hsu RF; Chen SS; Lu SN; Ho CK; Lin HF
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):330-5. PubMed ID: 21802644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of tone-pip auditory brainstem responses and auditory steady-state responses in infants aged 0-6 months.
    Qian L; Yi W; Xingqi L; Yinsheng C; Wenying N; Lili X; Yinghui L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jul; 130(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 20092381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Utility of auditory steady-state and brainstem responses in age-related hearing loss in rats.
    Sanz-Fernández R; Sánchez-Rodriguez C; Granizo JJ; Durio-Calero E; Martín-Sanz E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Jan; 135(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 25373888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Test accuracy and prognostic validity of multiple auditory steady state responses for targeted hearing screening.
    Savio G; Perez-Abalo MC; Gaya J; Hernandez O; Mijares E
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Feb; 45(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 16566249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the modulation transfer function of auditory steady state responses in the 65 Hz to 120 Hz range.
    Purcell DW; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):667-78. PubMed ID: 20517156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects.
    Herdman AT; Stapells DR
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 11330918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A study of auditory screening in infant by evoked otoacoustic emission (EOAE)].
    Satoh N
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 67(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 1597303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.