128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21167033)
1. Impact of informed-choice invitations on diabetes screening knowledge, attitude and intentions: an analogue study.
Mann E; Kellar I; Sutton S; Kinmonth AL; Hankins M; Griffin S; Marteau TM
BMC Public Health; 2010 Dec; 10():768. PubMed ID: 21167033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.
Mann E; Prevost AT; Griffin S; Kellar I; Sutton S; Parker M; Sanderson S; Kinmonth AL; Marteau TM
BMC Public Health; 2009 Feb; 9():63. PubMed ID: 19232112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening.
Kellar I; Sutton S; Griffin S; Prevost AT; Kinmonth AL; Marteau TM
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Aug; 72(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 18513916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can informed choice invitations lead to inequities in intentions to make lifestyle changes among participants in a primary care diabetes screening programme? Evidence from a randomized trial.
Kellar I; Mann E; Kinmonth AL; Prevost AT; Sutton S; Marteau TM
Public Health; 2011 Sep; 125(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 21764087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.
Marteau TM; Mann E; Prevost AT; Vasconcelos JC; Kellar I; Sanderson S; Parker M; Griffin S; Sutton S; Kinmonth AL
BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2138. PubMed ID: 20466791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.
Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Martínez-Alonso M; Garcia M; Sala M; Perestelo-Pérez L; Vidal C; Codern-Bové N; Feijoo-Cid M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Cardona À; Pons A; Carles-Lavila M; Rue M;
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214057. PubMed ID: 30913217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do women make an informed choice about participating in breast cancer screening? A survey among women invited for a first mammography screening examination.
van Agt H; Fracheboud J; van der Steen A; de Koning H
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Nov; 89(2):353-9. PubMed ID: 22963769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Social patterning in knowledge following an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening.
Kellar I; Mason D
Diabet Med; 2014 Apr; 31(4):504-8. PubMed ID: 24117707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomised trial of prostate cancer screening in The Netherlands: assessment of acceptance and motives for attendance.
Nijs HG; Tordoir DM; Schuurman JH; Kirkels WJ; Schröder FH
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9275269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.
Steele RJC; Digby J; Chambers JA; O'Carroll RE
BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):411. PubMed ID: 30991987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interventions to enhance informed choices among invitees of screening programmes-a systematic review.
van Agt HM; Korfage IJ; Essink-Bot ML
Eur J Public Health; 2014 Oct; 24(5):789-801. PubMed ID: 24443115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested.
Watson E; Hewitson P; Brett J; Bukach C; Evans R; Edwards A; Elwyn G; Cargill A; Austoker J
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 16875796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of attitudes towards the targets of behaviour in predicting and informing prenatal testing choices.
Bryant LD; Green JM; Hewison J
Psychol Health; 2010 Dec; 25(10):1175-94. PubMed ID: 20204949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study.
Pop-Tudose ME; Popescu-Spineni D; Armean P; Pop IV
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Nov; 18(1):439. PubMed ID: 30419853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.
Sutton S; Bickler G; Sancho-Aldridge J; Saidi G
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Feb; 48(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8138773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions in relation to the early detection of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom.
McCaffery K; Wardle J; Waller J
Prev Med; 2003 May; 36(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 12689797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Informed choice in breast cancer screening: the role of education].
Pons-Rodríguez A; Martínez-Alonso M; Perestelo-Pérez L; Garcia M; Sala M; Rué M; ;
Gac Sanit; 2021; 35(3):243-249. PubMed ID: 32173050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized evaluation of loss and gain frames in an invitation to screening for type 2 diabetes: effects on attendance, anxiety and self-rated health.
Park P; Simmons RK; Prevost AT; Griffin SJ;
J Health Psychol; 2010 Mar; 15(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 20207663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
