BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21167520)

  • 1. Editorial comment.
    Eyre SJ
    J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):488. PubMed ID: 21167520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can we accurately identify men with low risk prostate cancer?
    Neal DE
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1217-8. PubMed ID: 18707718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate-specific antigen dynamics and prostate cancer diagnosis.
    Bartoletti R
    Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):761-2; discussion 763. PubMed ID: 19665286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate cancer screening.
    Roetzheim RG; Herold AH
    Prim Care; 1992 Sep; 19(3):637-49. PubMed ID: 1384077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for prostate cancer - will we ever know?
    Adolfsson J
    Acta Oncol; 2010 Apr; 49(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 20397764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serum prostate-specific antigen for the early detection of prostate cancer: always, never, or only sometimes?
    Carroll PR; Whitson JM; Cooperberg MR
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 29(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 21189396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Editorial comment on: predictive factors for progression in patients with clinical stage T1a prostate cancer in the PSA era.
    Joniau S
    Eur Urol; 2008 Feb; 53(2):362. PubMed ID: 17611018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editorial comment on: predictive factors for progression in patients with clinical stage T1a prostate cancer in the PSA era.
    Scattoni V
    Eur Urol; 2008 Feb; 53(2):361. PubMed ID: 17611014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial comment.
    Gupta A; Lilja H
    Urology; 2011 Apr; 77(4):903-4; author reply 904. PubMed ID: 21477718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive modeling for the presence of prostate carcinoma using clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound parameters in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels < or = 10 ng/ml.
    Stephan C; Jung K; Cammann H
    Cancer; 2004 May; 100(9):1989-90; author reply 1989-90. PubMed ID: 15112283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing risk: does this patient have prostate cancer?
    Carter HB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Apr; 98(8):506-7. PubMed ID: 16622114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to use PSA to screen for prostate cancer.
    Little B; Young M
    Int J Clin Pract; 2003; 57(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 12587941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy vs effectiveness in prostate-specific antigen screening.
    Albertsen PC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Mar; 102(5):288-9. PubMed ID: 20142583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial comment on: prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy.
    Ciatto S
    Eur Urol; 2010 Apr; 57(4):630. PubMed ID: 19375847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Editorial comment on: prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy.
    Semjonow A
    Eur Urol; 2010 Apr; 57(4):629-30. PubMed ID: 19375846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why are a high overdiagnosis probability and a long lead time for prostate cancer screening so important?
    Barry MJ; Mulley AJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Mar; 101(6):362-3. PubMed ID: 19276451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prostate cancer risk calculator from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial underestimates the risk of high grade cancer in contemporary referral patients.
    Ngo TC; Turnbull BB; Lavori PW; Presti JC
    J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):483-7. PubMed ID: 21167519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PSA screening: the bottom line.
    Elhilali MM
    CMAJ; 2000 Mar; 162(6):791-2. PubMed ID: 10750466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial comment on: preliminary results of a novel method to estimate the probability of prostate cancer in men with elevated serum PSA values.
    Chun FK; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):702. PubMed ID: 18403097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prostate cancer: A challenge for screening.
    Donnell RF
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 8(4):693-702, vii. PubMed ID: 10452935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.