179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21167758)
1. Comparison of root canal preparation using Flex Master Ni-Ti and Endo-Eze AET stainless steel instruments.
Nordmeyer S; Schnell V; Hülsmann M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 21167758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of root canal preparation using reciprocating Safesiders stainless steel and Vortex nickel-titanium instruments.
Rhodes SC; Hülsmann M; McNeal SF; Beck P; Eleazer PD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 May; 111(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 21411348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Hiller C; Huda M; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 21276014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of cervical preflaring using different rotary nickel-titanium systems on the accuracy of apical file size determination.
Tennert C; Herbert J; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT
J Endod; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1669-72. PubMed ID: 20850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments.
Schäfer E; Lau R
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 10530244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files.
Thomas AS; Hartwell GR; Moon PC
J Endod; 2003 Oct; 29(10):662-3. PubMed ID: 14606791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Manual or rotary root canal preparation? Nickel-titanium or stainless steel? Review of the literature].
Beun S; Bogaerts P; Van Nieuwenhuysen JP
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16082877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of root canal curvatures before and after canal preparation (part II): A method based on numeric calculus.
Sonntag D; Stachniss-Carp S; Stachniss C; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2006 Apr; 32(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16603041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
