179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21167758)
21. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals.
You SY; Bae KS; Baek SH; Kum KY; Shon WJ; Lee W
J Endod; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1991-4. PubMed ID: 21092819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET)--a crown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, operative procedure and instruments.
Riitano F
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):575-87. PubMed ID: 16011778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Lohmann D
Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
Özer SY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the shaping ability of RaCe and FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals.
Merrett SJ; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):960-2. PubMed ID: 16982273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modeling capacity of ENDOflash files in simulated root canals.
Fariniuk LF; Baratto-Filho F; Guerisoli DM; Barbizam JV; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11210250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study.
Schäfer E; Schulz-Bongert U; Tulus G
J Endod; 2004 Jun; 30(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 15167474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanical behaviour of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments in simulated clinical conditions: a computational study.
Necchi S; Taschieri S; Petrini L; Migliavacca F
Int Endod J; 2008 Nov; 41(11):939-49. PubMed ID: 19133083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study.
Elmsallati EA; Wadachi R; Suda H
Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19703077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography.
Versiani MA; Pascon EA; de Sousa CJ; Borges MA; Sousa-Neto MD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 18424117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The accuracy of the Neosono Ultima EZ apex locator using files of different alloys: an in vitro study.
Nekoofar MH; Sadeghi K; Sadighi Akha E; Namazikhah MS
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Sep; 30(9):681-4. PubMed ID: 12365847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment.
Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Schneider FH; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 16545721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
