These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21167758)
41. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination. Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The effectiveness of three instrumentation techniques on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from a root canal: an in vitro study. Colak M; Evcil S; Bayindir YZ; Yigit N J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 15719081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The LightSpeed system. Barbakow F Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Jan; 48(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 15066510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography. Fischer D Int Endod J; 2006 Apr; 39(4):332; author reply 332-3. PubMed ID: 16584500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments. Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Nickel-titanium rotary systems: review of existing instruments and geometries. Ruddle CJ Dent Today; 2000 Oct; 19(10):86-8, 90-5. PubMed ID: 12524811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests. Kazemi RB; Stenman E; Spångberg LS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 11027388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals. Ayar LR; Love RM Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of molar root canal preparations using six instruments and instrumentation techniques. Roig-Cayón M; Basilio-Monné J; Abós-Herrándiz R; Brau-Aguadé E; Canalda-Sahli C J Endod; 1997 Jun; 23(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 9545948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A numerical method for predicting the bending fatigue life of NiTi and stainless steel root canal instruments. Cheung GS; Zhang EW; Zheng YF Int Endod J; 2011 Apr; 44(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 21219364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of early coronal flaring on working length change in curved canals using rotary nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instruments. Davis RD; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC J Endod; 2002 Jun; 28(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 12067124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. Gambill JM; Alder M; del Rio CE J Endod; 1996 Jul; 22(7):369-75. PubMed ID: 8935064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Yared G Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 18081803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]