BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21167800)

  • 1. Using X-chromosomal markers in relationship testing: calculation of likelihood ratios taking both linkage and linkage disequilibrium into account.
    Tillmar AO; Egeland T; Lindblom B; Holmlund G; Mostad P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 21167800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of linkage and linkage disequilibrium for eight X-STR markers.
    Tillmar AO; Mostad P; Egeland T; Lindblom B; Holmlund G; Montelius K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Dec; 3(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19083865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
    Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis of X-STRs in Italian families.
    Inturri S; Menegon S; Amoroso A; Torre C; Robino C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Mar; 5(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 21087904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. X-chromosomal markers: past, present and future.
    Szibor R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 19083736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An efficient, robust and unified method for mapping complex traits (III): combined linkage/linkage-disequilibrium analysis.
    Zhao LP; Quiaoit F; Aragaki C; Hsu L
    Am J Med Genet; 1999 Jun; 84(5):433-53. PubMed ID: 10360398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanding X-chromosomal forensic haplotype frequencies database: Italian population data of four linkage groups.
    Bini C; Riccardi LN; Ceccardi S; Carano F; Sarno S; Luiselli D; Pelotti S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Mar; 15():127-30. PubMed ID: 25435156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population genetic evaluation of eight X-chromosomal short tandem repeat loci using Mentype Argus X-8 PCR amplification kit.
    Becker D; Rodig H; Augustin C; Edelmann J; Götz F; Hering S; Szibor R; Brabetz W
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 19083792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Haplotypic structure of the X chromosome in the COGA population sample and the quality of its reconstruction by extant software packages.
    Marroni F; Toni C; Pennato B; Tsai YY; Duggal P; Bailey-Wilson JE; Presciuttini S
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S77. PubMed ID: 16451691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of linkage between vWA and D12S391 in kinship analysis.
    O'Connor KL; Tillmar AO
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):840-4. PubMed ID: 22542849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linkage, recombination, and mutation rate analyses of 19 X-chromosomal STR loci in Chinese Southern Han pedigrees.
    Yang X; Chen Y; Zeng X; Chen L; Liu C; Liu H; Xu Q; Budowle B; Liu C
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1691-1698. PubMed ID: 31317316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phylogeography of haplotypes of five microsatellites located in a low-recombination region of the X chromosome: studies worldwide and in Brazilian populations.
    Pereira RW; Pena SD
    Genetica; 2006 Jan; 126(1-2):243-50. PubMed ID: 16502100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL.
    Zhao H; Nettleton D; Soller M; Dekkers JC
    Genet Res; 2005 Aug; 86(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 16181525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 20457080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A general model for likelihood computations of genetic marker data accounting for linkage, linkage disequilibrium, and mutations.
    Kling D; Tillmar A; Egeland T; Mostad P
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Sep; 129(5):943-54. PubMed ID: 25425094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for multipoint disease mapping using linkage disequilibrium.
    Rannala B; Slatkin M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S71-7. PubMed ID: 11055373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A general method to assess the utility of the X-chromosomal markers in kinship testing.
    Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 21592877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment and implications of linkage disequilibrium in genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite panels.
    Goode EL; Jarvik GP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S72-6. PubMed ID: 16342185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.