These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21167837)
1. Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes. Poelwijk FJ; Tănase-Nicola S; Kiviet DJ; Tans SJ J Theor Biol; 2011 Mar; 272(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 21167837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relation Between the Number of Peaks and the Number of Reciprocal Sign Epistatic Interactions. Saona R; Kondrashov FA; Khudiakova KA Bull Math Biol; 2022 Jun; 84(8):74. PubMed ID: 35713756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple peaks and reciprocal sign epistasis in an empirically determined genotype-phenotype landscape. Dawid A; Kiviet DJ; Kogenaru M; de Vos M; Tans SJ Chaos; 2010 Jun; 20(2):026105. PubMed ID: 20590334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Weinreich DM; Watson RA; Chao L Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16050094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The peaks and geometry of fitness landscapes. Crona K; Greene D; Barlow M J Theor Biol; 2013 Jan; 317():1-10. PubMed ID: 23036916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes. de Visser JA; Park SC; Krug J Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S15-30. PubMed ID: 19456267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Khan AI; Dinh DM; Schneider D; Lenski RE; Cooper TF Science; 2011 Jun; 332(6034):1193-6. PubMed ID: 21636772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of epistatic selection on the genomic traces of selection. Otto SP; Whitlock MC Mol Ecol; 2009 Dec; 18(24):4985-7. PubMed ID: 20025656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Martin G; Elena SF; Lenormand T Nat Genet; 2007 Apr; 39(4):555-60. PubMed ID: 17369829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computational Complexity as an Ultimate Constraint on Evolution. Kaznatcheev A Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):245-265. PubMed ID: 30833289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature. Weinreich DM; Chao L Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 16050095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reciprocal sign epistasis and truncation selection: When is recombination favorable in a pre-breeding program with a selfing species? Vagne C; David J; Tavaud M; Fontez B J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 386():44-54. PubMed ID: 26334476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Epistatic interactions determine the mutational pathways and coexistence of lineages in clonal Escherichia coli populations. Maharjan RP; Ferenci T Evolution; 2013 Sep; 67(9):2762-8. PubMed ID: 24033182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring epistasis in fitness landscapes: The correlation of fitness effects of mutations. Ferretti L; Schmiegelt B; Weinreich D; Yamauchi A; Kobayashi Y; Tajima F; Achaz G J Theor Biol; 2016 May; 396():132-43. PubMed ID: 26854875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The rank ordering of genotypic fitness values predicts genetic constraint on natural selection on landscapes lacking sign epistasis. Weinreich DM Genetics; 2005 Nov; 171(3):1397-405. PubMed ID: 16079241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fitness landscapes emerging from pharmacodynamic functions in the evolution of multidrug resistance. Engelstädter J J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):840-53. PubMed ID: 24720850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epistasis and frequency dependence influence the fitness of an adaptive mutation in a diversifying lineage. Le Gac M; Doebeli M Mol Ecol; 2010 Jun; 19(12):2430-8. PubMed ID: 20497320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the incongruence of genotype-phenotype and fitness landscapes. Srivastava M; Payne JL PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Sep; 18(9):e1010524. PubMed ID: 36121840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome structure and the benefit of sex. Watson RA; Weinreich DM; Wakeley J Evolution; 2011 Feb; 65(2):523-36. PubMed ID: 21029076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]