218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21168168)
1. Editorial comment.
Cost NG; Margulis V
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):413; author reply 414. PubMed ID: 21168168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of patients with small renal masses: a survey of the American Urological Association.
Breau RH; Crispen PL; Jenkins SM; Blute ML; Leibovich BC
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 21168170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial comment.
Penson DF
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):413-4; author reply 414. PubMed ID: 21168163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is simple enucleation a minimal partial nephrectomy responding to the EAU guidelines' recommendations?
Ficarra V; Galfano A; Cavalleri S
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1315-8. PubMed ID: 18801609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rebuttal from authors re: Vincenzo Ficarra, Antonio Galfano and Stefano Cavalleri. Is simple enucleation a minimal partial nephrectomy responding to the EAU guidelines' recommendations? Eur Urol 2009;55:1315-8.
Minervini A; Serni S; Di Cristofano C; Carini M
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1319-20. PubMed ID: 18804906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial comment.
Russo P
Urology; 2010 Feb; 75(2):275-6; author reply 276. PubMed ID: 20152477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial comment from Dr Mitsui to association of renal nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Mitsui Y
Int J Urol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):571. PubMed ID: 23190363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Partial nephrectomy: contemporary outcomes, candidate selection, and surgical approach.
Kheterpal E; Taneja SS
Urol Clin North Am; 2012 May; 39(2):199-210, vii. PubMed ID: 22487763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Editorial comment from Dr Herrel and Dr Canter to association of renal nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Herrel LA; Canter D
Int J Urol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):570. PubMed ID: 23134225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Renal surgery--is technique more important than tumor or patient characteristics in preserving kidney function?
Goldfarb DA
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):383-4. PubMed ID: 21168169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial comment.
Pomara G; Francesca F
Urology; 2011 May; 77(5):1146; author reply 1146-7. PubMed ID: 21539964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editorial comment.
Russo P
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1082. PubMed ID: 19394510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial comment.
Shichman SJ
Urology; 2010 Feb; 75(2):281. PubMed ID: 20152480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial comment.
Lane BR; Campbell SC
Urology; 2010 Feb; 75(2):281. PubMed ID: 20152479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Renal cell carcinoma in octogenarians: nephron sparing surgery should remain the standard of care.
Hellenthal NJ; Mansour AM; Hayn MH; Schwaab T
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 21167523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current practice patterns in the surgical management of renal cancer in the United States.
Sivarajan G; Huang WC
Urol Clin North Am; 2012 May; 39(2):149-60, v. PubMed ID: 22487758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive therapy for renal cell carcinoma: is there a new community standard?
Best S; Ercole B; Lee C; Fallon E; Skenazy J; Monga M
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 15245926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renal cell carcinoma: urologists in a new era.
Uzzo RG
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1723-4. PubMed ID: 16217270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of surgery in the management of early-stage renal cancer.
Russo P
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2011 Aug; 25(4):737-52. PubMed ID: 21763965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nephron-sparing surgery.
Lane BR; Novick AC
BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5 Pt B):1245-50. PubMed ID: 17441918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
