These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21168479)

  • 21. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.
    Chua TE; Bachman M; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):679-89. PubMed ID: 21610498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users.
    Hoppe U; Rosanowski F; Iro H; Eysholdt U
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 11409789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming.
    Hodges AV; Balkany TJ; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Dolan-Ash S; Schloffman JJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):255-61. PubMed ID: 9334774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Dooley GJ; James CJ; Parisi ES
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 10708069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic Current Focusing: A Novel Approach to Loudness Coding in Cochlear Implants.
    de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 29742542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.
    Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):463-76. PubMed ID: 12411779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1985 May; 18(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 3840159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
    He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bilateral Loudness Balancing and Distorted Spatial Perception in Recipients of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Fitzgerald MB; Kan A; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e225-36. PubMed ID: 25985017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing auditory nerve condition by tone decay in deaf subjects with a cochlear implant.
    Wasmann JA; van Eijl RHM; Versnel H; van Zanten GA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):864-871. PubMed ID: 30261773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; van der Veen EH; Kalkman RK; Frijns JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 14(5):781-90. PubMed ID: 23695303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3164. PubMed ID: 28599571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Loudness Perception and Dynamic Range Depending on Interphase Gaps of Biphasic Pulses in Cochlear Implants.
    Pieper SH; Brill S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 31972773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
    Shannon RV; Otto SR
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.
    Gani M; Valentini G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Boëx C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 17216585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.