BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21168865)

  • 1. Is the screening method of sacral neuromodulation a prognostic factor for long-term success?
    Marcelissen T; Leong R; Serroyen J; van Kerrebroeck P; de Wachter S
    J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):583-7. PubMed ID: 21168865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PNE versus 1st stage tined lead procedure: a direct comparison to select the most sensitive test method to identify patients suitable for sacral neuromodulation therapy.
    Leong RK; De Wachter SG; Nieman FH; de Bie RA; van Kerrebroeck PE
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Sep; 30(7):1249-52. PubMed ID: 21404317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Satisfaction and patient experience with sacral neuromodulation: results of a single center sample survey.
    Leong RK; Marcelissen TA; Nieman FH; De Bie RA; Van Kerrebroeck PE; De Wachter SG
    J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):588-92. PubMed ID: 21168881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term results of sacral neuromodulation with the tined lead procedure.
    Marcelissen TA; Leong RK; de Bie RA; van Kerrebroeck PE; de Wachter SG
    J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):1997-2000. PubMed ID: 20850820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medium-term experience of sacral neuromodulation by tined lead implantation.
    Van Voskuilen AC; Oerlemans DJ; Weil EH; van den Hombergh U; van Kerrebroeck PE
    BJU Int; 2007 Jan; 99(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 16956350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sacral neuromodulation in urological indications: the Finnish experience.
    Vaarala MH; Tammela TL; Perttilä I; Luukkonen P; Hellström P
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Feb; 45(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 20961268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is sensory testing during lead placement crucial for achieving positive outcomes after sacral neuromodulation?
    Peters KM; Killinger KA; Boura JA
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Nov; 30(8):1489-92. PubMed ID: 21674596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sacral neuromodulation for treating the symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome and non-obstructive urinary retention: >10 years of clinical experience.
    Chartier-Kastler E
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 18070181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective single center study.
    van Voskuilen AC; Oerlemans DJ; Weil EH; de Bie RA; van Kerrebroeck PE
    Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 16413105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of pulse rate changes on the clinical outcome of sacral neuromodulation.
    Marcelissen TA; Leong RK; Nieman FH; de Bie RA; van Kerrebroeck PE; de Wachter SG
    J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1781-5. PubMed ID: 21420118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychological and psychiatric factors as predictors for success in sacral neuromodulation treatment.
    Marcelissen TA; Leong RK; Nieman FH; van Lankveld JJ; van Kerrebroeck PE; de Wachter SG
    BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1834-8. PubMed ID: 21810157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Results of sacral posterior neuromodulation on voiding disorders and impact on sexuality based on a single-center study].
    Ferhi K; Miaadi N; Tanneau Y; Leroi AM; Sibert L; Grise P
    Prog Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 18472068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic factors for successful percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation.
    van Balken MR; Vergunst H; Bemelmans BL
    Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):360-5. PubMed ID: 16359781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with percutaneous nerve evaluation and permanent sacral nerve modulation outcome in patients with fecal incontinence.
    Govaert B; Melenhorst J; Nieman FH; Bols EM; van Gemert WG; Baeten CG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Oct; 52(10):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19966599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of sacral neuromodulation on urological diseases: a multicentric research project.
    Cardarelli S; D'Elia C; Cerruto MA; Curti P; Ostardo E; Signorello D; Pastorello M; Caleffi G; Molon A; Artibani W
    Urologia; 2012; 79(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 22610844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11-year experience.
    Sutherland SE; Lavers A; Carlson A; Holtz C; Kesha J; Siegel SW
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(1):19-28; discussion 36. PubMed ID: 17078071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sacral neuromodulation in diabetic patients: success and complications in the treatment of voiding dysfunction.
    Daniels DH; Powell CR; Braasch MR; Kreder KJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Apr; 29(4):578-81. PubMed ID: 19760757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sacral neuromodulation and sexuality].
    Gamé X
    Prog Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):167. PubMed ID: 18472069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience.
    Spinelli M; Giardiello G; Gerber M; Arduini A; van den Hombergh U; Malaguti S
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1905-7. PubMed ID: 14532804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Duration of Complaints on Successful Outcome of Sacral Neuromodulation.
    Jairam R; Drossaerts J; van Koeveringe G; van Kerrebroeck P
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 28478446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.