BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21169092)

  • 1. [A critical review of the "peer review" process].
    Alfonso F
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2010; 80(4):272-82. PubMed ID: 21169092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers].
    Alfonso F
    Neurologia; 2010; 25(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 21093700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].
    Stijntjes F; Veeken H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The long pilgrimage of Spanish biomedical journals toward excellence. Who helps? Quality, impact and research merit].
    Alfonso F
    Endocrinol Nutr; 2010 Mar; 57(3):110-20. PubMed ID: 20347618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
    Felthous AR; Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 25187283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply.
    Jolly PD
    N Z Vet J; 2003 Aug; 51(4):199. PubMed ID: 16032326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
    Faggion CM
    Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles].
    Shashok K
    Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1946-50. PubMed ID: 9528039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper.
    Kumar PD
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1999 Feb; 47(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 10999090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The significance of publication in Dutch medical journals using an external peer review system].
    Visser HK
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(14):798-801. PubMed ID: 9646614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical journal peer review: process and bias.
    Manchikanti L; Kaye AD; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):E1-E14. PubMed ID: 25675064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?
    Allen TW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The reviewers' review].
    Rabinerson D; Horowitz E; Peled Y
    Harefuah; 2006 Aug; 145(8):587-91, 630. PubMed ID: 16983843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revealing the faults in medical journals.
    Liesegang TJ
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19333735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to Review a Manuscript.
    Hill JA
    J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 26850498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?
    Ferreira C; Bastille-Rousseau G; Bennett AM; Ellington EH; Terwissen C; Austin C; Borlestean A; Boudreau MR; Chan K; Forsythe A; Hossie TJ; Landolt K; Longhi J; Otis JA; Peers MJ; Rae J; Seguin J; Watt C; Wehtje M; Murray DL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 Aug; 91(3):597-610. PubMed ID: 25865035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer-Review and Rejection Causes in Submitting Original Medical Manuscripts.
    Mendiola Pastrana IR; Hernández AV; Pérez Manjarrez FE; López EO; Romero-Henríquez LF; López-Ortiz G
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2020; 40(3):182-186. PubMed ID: 32427687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.