These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21169582)

  • 1. Speeded induction under uncertainty: the influence of multiple categories and feature conjunctions.
    Newell BR; Paton H; Hayes BK; Griffiths O
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):869-74. PubMed ID: 21169582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature-based versus category-based induction with uncertain categories.
    Griffiths O; Hayes BK; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):576-95. PubMed ID: 22060277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noncategorical approaches to feature prediction with uncertain categories.
    Papadopoulos C; Hayes BK; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):304-18. PubMed ID: 21264571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of emotionally charged information on category-based induction.
    Zhu J; Murphy GL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54286. PubMed ID: 23372700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction with uncertain categories: When do people consider the category alternatives?
    Hayes BK; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):730-43. PubMed ID: 19679854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Where to look first for an explanation of induction with uncertain categories.
    Griffiths O; Hayes BK; Newell BR; Papadopoulos C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 21935736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature inference with uncertain categorization: Re-assessing Anderson's rational model.
    Konovalova E; Le Mens G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1666-1681. PubMed ID: 28924732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit and explicit processes in category-based induction: is induction best when we don't think?
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):227-46. PubMed ID: 23506087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyetracking reveals multiple-category use in induction.
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1050-67. PubMed ID: 26727126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainty in category-based induction: when do people integrate across categories?
    Murphy GL; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 20192530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision making under uncertain categorization.
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():991. PubMed ID: 25309475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Category-based predictions: influence of uncertainty and feature associations.
    Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):736-53. PubMed ID: 8656154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of causal information on judgments of treatment efficacy.
    Yopchick JE; Kim NS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 19103973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tracking mouse movement in feature inference: category labels are different from feature labels.
    Yamauchi T; Kohn N; Yu NY
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):852-63. PubMed ID: 17910171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature taxonomy: What type of features do children associate with categories and how do they fare in predicting category judgments?
    Djalal FM; Storms G; Ameel E; Heyman T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jul; 178():114-123. PubMed ID: 28549663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting features for members of natural categories when categorization is uncertain.
    Malt BC; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 May; 21(3):646-61. PubMed ID: 7602266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can semi-supervised learning explain incorrect beliefs about categories?
    Kalish CW; Rogers TT; Lang J; Zhu X
    Cognition; 2011 Jul; 120(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 21474122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature highlighting enhances learning of a complex natural-science category.
    Miyatsu T; Gouravajhala R; Nosofsky RM; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 29698049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments.
    Spalding TL; Murphy GL
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):856-67. PubMed ID: 10540814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conceptual combination: conjunction and negation of natural concepts.
    Hampton JA
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):888-909. PubMed ID: 9421575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.