138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21169866)
1. Cervical biopsy sampling variability in ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 21169866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.
Ferris DG; Litaker M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15870519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1934-41. PubMed ID: 15592275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):704-10. PubMed ID: 16522401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of telecolposcopy compared with traditional colposcopy.
Ferris DG; Macfee MS; Miller JA; Litaker MS; Crawley D; Watson D
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 11814505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopists' agreement on cervical biopsy site.
Elit L; Julian JA; Sellors JW; Levine M
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2007; 34(2):88-90. PubMed ID: 17629159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ
J Fam Pract; 1996 Mar; 42(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8636676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study.
Stoler MH; Schiffman M;
JAMA; 2001 Mar; 285(11):1500-5. PubMed ID: 11255427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current views and practices in the management of low-grade cervical abnormalities-results of a British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Study.
Moss EL; Jones PW; Finn C; Redman CW; Todd R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 20885152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of colposcopy in the detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions among women with transformation zone type 3.
Li X; Zhao Y; Xiang F; Zhang X; Chen Z; Zhang M; Kang X; Wu R
BMC Cancer; 2024 Mar; 24(1):381. PubMed ID: 38528547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy.
Gage JC; Hanson VW; Abbey K; Dippery S; Gardner S; Kubota J; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Jeronimo J;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 16880294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN.
Hopman EH; Voorhorst FJ; Kenemans P; Meyer CJ; Helmerhorst TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 7622107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images.
Jeronimo J; Massad LS; Castle PE; Wacholder S; Schiffman M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):833-40. PubMed ID: 17906017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
