276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21170578)
1. HPV testing for cervical cancer screening appears more cost-effective than Papanicolau cytology in Mexico.
Flores YN; Bishai DM; Lorincz A; Shah KV; Lazcano-Ponce E; Hernández M; Granados-García V; Pérez R; Salmerón J
Cancer Causes Control; 2011 Feb; 22(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 21170578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and methods of the evaluation of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Mexico: The Morelos HPV Study.
Flores Y; Shah K; Lazcano E; Hernández M; Bishai D; Ferris DG; Lörincz A; Hernández P; Salmerón J;
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 12216521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of HPV-based assays with Papanicolaou smears for cervical cancer screening in Morelos State, Mexico.
Salmerón J; Lazcano-Ponce E; Lorincz A; Hernández M; Hernández P; Leyva A; Uribe M; Manzanares H; Antunez A; Carmona E; Ronnett BM; Sherman ME; Bishai D; Ferris D; Flores Y; Yunes E; Shah KV
Cancer Causes Control; 2003 Aug; 14(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 12948281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of HPV self-testing offered to non-attendees in cervical cancer screening in Switzerland.
Vassilakos P; Poncet A; Catarino R; Viviano M; Petignat P; Combescure C
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 30718124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study.
Aarnio R; Östensson E; Olovsson M; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jul; 20(1):645. PubMed ID: 32660432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A pilot study of HPV DNA and cytology testing in 50,159 women in the routine Mexican Social Security Program.
Lazcano-Ponce E; Lörincz AT; Salmerón J; Fernández I; Cruz A; Hernández P; Mejia I; Hernández-Avila M
Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1693-700. PubMed ID: 20617376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.
Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Womack SM; Jacobson D; Yi B; Hwang YT; Gold K; Barter J; Shah K
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2372-81. PubMed ID: 11988058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.
Östensson E; Hellström AC; Hellman K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Wilander E; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 23530870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.
Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Gaffikin L; Limpahayom KK; Lumbiganon P; Warakamin S; King J; Yi B; Ringers P; Blumenthal PD
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(19):1469-83. PubMed ID: 12359856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of 21 alternative cervical cancer screening strategies.
Chuck A
Value Health; 2010; 13(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 19804436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Previous Papanicolaou and Hybrid Capture 2 human papillomavirus testing results of 5699 women with histologically diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3.
Wu T; Chen X; Zheng B; Li J; Xie F; Ding X; Zeng Z; Zhao C
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 31272603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving cervical cancer screening in Mexico: results from the Morelos HPV Study.
Flores Y; Bishai D; Lazcano E; Shah K; Lörincz A; Hernández M; Salmerón J
Salud Publica Mex; 2003; 45 Suppl 3():S388-98. PubMed ID: 14746032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Québec, Canada.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Mayrand MH; Santas CC; Goggin P
Can J Public Health; 2010; 101(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 20737813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Three Approaches for Cervical Cancer Screening among HIV-Positive Women in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lince-Deroche N; Phiri J; Michelow P; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141969. PubMed ID: 26569487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Testing, Cytology and Co-testing as Cervical Cancer Screening for Women Above Age 30 Years.
Jin XW; Lipold L; Foucher J; Sikon A; Brainard J; Belinson J; Schramm S; Nottingham K; Hu B; Rothberg MB
J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1338-1344. PubMed ID: 27418345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening.
Naucler P; Ryd W; Törnberg S; Strand A; Wadell G; Elfgren K; Rådberg T; Strander B; Forslund O; Hansson BG; Hagmar B; Johansson B; Rylander E; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jan; 101(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 19141778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
