168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21170902)
1. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1237-56. PubMed ID: 12111876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer.
Gatsonis C; Paliwal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 16861527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast masses: an SROC curve with fixed and random effects linear meta-regression models.
Akçil M; Karaağaoğlu E; Demirhan B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 May; 36(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 18418880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
Nikoloulopoulos AK
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods.
Vamvakas EC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Aug; 122(8):675-86. PubMed ID: 9701328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic value of anti-alpha-fodrin antibody testing for Sjögren's syndrome: a meta-analysis].
Huang QS; LE AP; Luo ZQ; Li JM; Wang WQ; Ju BH; Wan LG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 88(42):2971-6. PubMed ID: 19080074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Procedures for performing meta-analyses of the accuracy of tools for binary classification].
Botella J; Huang H
Psicothema; 2012 Feb; 24(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 22269376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic accuracy].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
