BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21172105)

  • 21. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.
    Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database.
    Barocas DA; Cowan JE; Smith JA; Carroll PR;
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1330-4; discussion 1334-5. PubMed ID: 18707731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of post-radical prostatectomy pathological outcome for stage T1c prostate cancer with percent free prostate specific antigen: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.
    Southwick PC; Catalona WJ; Partin AW; Slawin KM; Brawer MK; Flanigan RC; Patel A; Richie JP; Walsh PC; Scardino PT; Lange PH; Gasior GH; Parson RE; Loveland KG
    J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1346-51. PubMed ID: 10492194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Schnall M; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
    J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 7539857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Analysis of anatomopathological results of radical prostatectomy specimen of patients who answer to criteria for active surveillance of prostate cancer].
    Azancot V; Peyromaure M; Xylinas E; Descazeaud A; Cornud F; Vieillefond A; Saighi D; Amsellem-Ouazana D; Debré B; Zerbib M
    Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):619-23. PubMed ID: 19800552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prostate-specific antigen velocity in untreated, localized prostate cancer.
    Venkitaraman R; Norman A; Woode-Amissah R; Dearnaley D; Horwich A; Huddart R; Parker C
    BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 17850368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting risk of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy with the Center for Prostate Disease Research and Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor databases.
    Moul JW; Connelly RR; Lubeck DP; Bauer JJ; Sun L; Flanders SC; Grossfeld GD; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1322-7. PubMed ID: 11547066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prognostic indicators for long term outcome following radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer involving the seminal vesicles.
    Johnson CW; Anastasiadis AG; McKiernan JM; Salomon L; Eaton S; Goluboff ET; Olsson CA; Benson MC
    Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 15082006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
    Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
    DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
    Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H
    BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does initial surveillance in early prostate cancer reduce the chance of cure by radical prostatectomy?--A case control study.
    Khatami A; Damber JE; Lodding P; Pihl CG; Hugosson J
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 12775279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
    Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
    BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
    Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
    Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
    BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Incidence and follow-up of patients with focal prostate carcinoma in 2 screening rounds after an interval of 4 years.
    Postma R; de Vries SH; Roobol MJ; Wildhagen MF; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(4):708-16. PubMed ID: 15648082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contemporary survival results and the role of radiation therapy in patients with node negative seminal vesicle invasion following radical prostatectomy.
    Eggener SE; Roehl KA; Smith ND; Antenor JA; Han M; Catalona WJ
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1150-5. PubMed ID: 15758725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Oncologic outcome and patterns of recurrence after salvage radical prostatectomy.
    Paparel P; Cronin AM; Savage C; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):404-10. PubMed ID: 18639970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.