126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21172706)
1. Editorial comment.
Nelson CP
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):680-1; author reply 681. PubMed ID: 21172706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Editorial comment.
Merguerian PA
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):681; author reply 681. PubMed ID: 21172703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of internal stent, external transanastomotic stent or no stent during pediatric pyeloplasty: a decision tree cost-effectiveness analysis.
Yiee JH; Baskin LS
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):673-80. PubMed ID: 21172705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties. L. H. P. Braga, A. J. Lorenzo, W. A. Farhat, D. J. Bägli, A. E. Khoury and J. L. Pippi Salle. J Urol 2008; 180: 1693-1699.
Castagnetti M; Rigamonti W
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):399-400. PubMed ID: 19467676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Editorial comment. D. A. Canning, J Urol 2006; 176: 2242.
Griffin SJ; Steinbrecher HA
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2399; author reply 2399-400. PubMed ID: 17509374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial comment.
Lorenzo AJ
J Urol; 2011 Mar; 185(3):1069-70. PubMed ID: 21262511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial comment on: Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Fornara P; Greco F
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):858. PubMed ID: 19359090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Farhat WA; Bägli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. PubMed ID: 18708220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The importance of crossing vessels in ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Varkarakis IM; Deliveliotis C
Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2007 May; 4(5):232-3. PubMed ID: 17483809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Placement of a transvaginal bone-anchored sling A new minimally invasive technique is useful in stress urinary incontinence.
Rapp DE; Kobashi KC; Govier FE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):345.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19167696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial comment.
Hindley RG; Barber N
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1040; author reply 1041. PubMed ID: 19883816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editorial comment.
Koyle MA
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1312; author reply 1312-3. PubMed ID: 19962534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial comment.
Kass EJ
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2433; discussion 2434. PubMed ID: 19765767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial comment.
Castagnetti M
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2432-3; discussion 2434. PubMed ID: 19765750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial comment.
Wolf JS
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1034; author reply 1034-5. PubMed ID: 19883815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Editorial comment.
Farhat WA
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1566-7; discussion 1568. PubMed ID: 19683761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Editorial comment.
González R
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1567; discussion 1568. PubMed ID: 19683755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Editorial comment.
Peters CA
J Urol; 2011 Jun; 185(6 Suppl):2522. PubMed ID: 21555028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial comment.
Farhat WA
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1467; author reply 1468. PubMed ID: 21334646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial comment.
Kurzrock EA
J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1550; discussion 1550. PubMed ID: 20176379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
