These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21173135)

  • 1. The changing spectrum of DNA-based specimen provenance testing in surgical pathology.
    Pfeifer JD; Zehnbauer B; Payton J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jan; 135(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 21173135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rate of occult specimen provenance complications in routine clinical practice.
    Pfeifer JD; Liu J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 139(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 23270904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of mislabeled specimen by molecular methods: case report and review.
    Mariappan MR; Zehnder J; Arber DA; Lay M; Fadare O; Schrijver I
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2005 Jul; 13(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 16086080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of tissue contamination by polymorphic deletion probe fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Chiang S; Yip S; Betensky RA; Batten JM; Misdraji J; John Iafrate A
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Oct; 36(10):1464-71. PubMed ID: 22982889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.
    Meier FA; Varney RC; Zarbo RJ
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Sep; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 21841408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying cross contaminants and specimen mix-ups in surgical pathology.
    Hunt JL
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2008 Jul; 15(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 18580097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular confirmation of pathological specimen integrity in Australasia.
    Bell CG; Wood DR; Cheong SJ; Kwan E; Sinosich M; Delprado W; Baumgart KW
    Pathology; 2009; 41(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 19291541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a decision-analytic model for the application of STR-based provenance testing of transrectal prostate biopsy specimens.
    Pfeifer JD; Singleton MN; Gregory MH; Lambert DL; Kymes SM
    Value Health; 2012; 15(6):860-7. PubMed ID: 22999136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Valenstein PN; Sirota RL
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):979-96, vii. PubMed ID: 15555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A study of forensic DNA databases].
    Sun D; Hou Y; Li Y; Wu J; Du Q
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 19(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 12170476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
    Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applications of forensic identity testing in the clinical laboratory.
    Tsongalis GJ; Wu AH; Silver H; Ricci A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jul; 112(1 Suppl 1):S93-103. PubMed ID: 10396304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance characteristics of commercial Y-STR multiplex systems.
    Mayntz-Press KA; Ballantyne J
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 17681001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk investigations involving genetic identification.
    Wenk RE
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1999; 19(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 10538004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.
    Makary MA; Epstein J; Pronovost PJ; Millman EA; Hartmann EC; Freischlag JA
    Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 17383521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A new remedy in pathology practice: molecular solution to sample mix-up].
    Baloğlu H; Yığıt N
    Turk Patoloji Derg; 2011 May; 27(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 21630195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The challenge and importance of standardizing pre-analytical variables in surgical pathology specimens for clinical care and translational research.
    Hicks DG; Boyce BF
    Biotech Histochem; 2012 Jan; 87(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 21732745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.
    Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 8629896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identity determination in diagnostic surgical pathology.
    Pfeifer JD
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2019 Sep; 36(5):355-365. PubMed ID: 31196743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.