These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2117369)

  • 1. Ionic vs nonionic contrast media: a proposal.
    Lasser EC; Berry CC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Sep; 155(3):651-2. PubMed ID: 2117369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adverse reactions to contrast media. Ionic and nonionic media and steroids.
    Lasser EC; Berry CC
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):402-3. PubMed ID: 1815541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonionic vs ionic contrast media: what do the data tell us?
    Lasser EC; Berry CC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):945-6. PubMed ID: 2650493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ionic vs. nonionic contrast media.
    Lloyd K
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 7997528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iodinated radiographic contrast media: comparison of low-osmolar with conventional ionic agents [corrected].
    Rubin JD; Cohan RH
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 3(5):637-45. PubMed ID: 1931499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Benness GT; Fischer HW
    Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):282. PubMed ID: 2909115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: Ionic versus nonionic contrast media.
    Silverman PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1620-1. PubMed ID: 9168744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable effects of radiological contrast media on thrombus growth in a rabbit jugular vein thrombosis model.
    Levi M; Biemond BJ; Sturk A; Hoek J; ten Cate JW
    Thromb Haemost; 1991 Aug; 66(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 1771615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Economics and efficacy of the use of contrast media].
    Seyferth W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 1821632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1095-7. PubMed ID: 8911157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ionic contrast media induced more apoptosis in diabetic kidney than nonionic contrast media.
    Lee HC; Chang JG; Yen HW; Liu IH; Lai WT; Sheu SH
    J Nephrol; 2011; 24(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 20890877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Asymptomatic blood pressure and pulse rate changes during intravenous urography. Ionic contrast media vs. nonionic contrast media].
    Miwa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1082-6. PubMed ID: 2247349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morbidity and mortality with intravenous contrast media. Ionic and nonionic.
    Palmer J
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25 Suppl 1():S18-9. PubMed ID: 2283242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The effects of contrast media on the cardiac conducting system in coronary angiography].
    Kawamori J
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 49(11):1372-81. PubMed ID: 2602100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the blood coagulation system, the fibrinolytic system and platelets].
    Himi K; Himi S; Takemoto A; Kamata R
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Sep; 51(9):1037-44. PubMed ID: 1945784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A retrospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Yamaguchi K; Takanashi I; Kanauchi T; Hoshi T; Kubota H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 52(11):1565-70. PubMed ID: 1465338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of non-ionic contrast media in vascular applications.
    Malott JC; Fodor J
    Radiol Technol; 1984; 56(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6390518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.