219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21173706)
1. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals.
Ito K; Tawara A; Kubota T; Harada Y
J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21173706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry.
Oncel B; Dinc U; Orge F; Yalvac B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):936-41. PubMed ID: 19882585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contour tonometry in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: factors associated with intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude.
Moghimi S; Torabi H; Fakhraie G; Nassiri N; Mohammadi M
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 23741135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Ophthalmology; 2007 Apr; 114(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 17141320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX-10 non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects.
Pelit A; Altan-Yaycioglu R; Pelit A; Akova YA
Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 18637107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry.
Hsu SY; Sheu MM; Hsu AH; Wu KY; Yeh JI; Tien JN; Tsai RK
Eye (Lond); 2009 Jul; 23(7):1582-8. PubMed ID: 19407845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude.
Erickson DH; Goodwin D; Rollins M; Belaustegui A; Anderson C
Optometry; 2009 Apr; 80(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 19329059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lee J; Lee CH; Choi J; Yoon SY; Sung KR; Park SB; Kook MS
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19337476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
