202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21174068)
1. [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract].
Schwameis K; Zacherl J
Chirurg; 2011 Jan; 82(1):26, 28-33. PubMed ID: 21174068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses.
Beitler AL; Urschel JD
Am J Surg; 1998 Apr; 175(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 9568667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Bundred JR; Singh P; Pasquali S; Griffiths EA
BJS Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 32445431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of a novel intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic technique.
Kesler KA; Ramchandani NK; Jalal SI; Stokes SM; Mankins MR; Ceppa D; Birdas TJ; Vardas PN; Rieger KM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 156(4):1739-1745.e1. PubMed ID: 30033105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stapled anastomosis versus hand-sewn anastomosis of gastro/duodenojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Khan RMA; Malik S; Mansour M; Kausar A; Subar D
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():1-8. PubMed ID: 28987557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Slesser AA; Pellino G; Shariq O; Cocker D; Kontovounisios C; Rasheed S; Tekkis PP
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):667-76. PubMed ID: 27554096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Anastomotic techniques for the gastrointestinal tract].
Laukötter MG; Senninger N
Chirurg; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1085-96, quiz 1097-8. PubMed ID: 24337221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.
Liu QX; Min JX; Deng XF; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(45):17218-26. PubMed ID: 25493038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.
Singh D; Maley RH; Santucci T; Macherey RS; Bartley S; Weyant RJ; Landreneau RJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Feb; 71(2):419-24. PubMed ID: 11235681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function.
Ramchandani NK; Kesler KA; Rogers JD; Valsangkar N; Stokes SM; Jalal SI
J Vis Exp; 2020 Apr; (158):. PubMed ID: 32364542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis.
Slieker JC; Daams F; Mulder IM; Jeekel J; Lange JF
JAMA Surg; 2013 Feb; 148(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 23426599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy.
Sepesi B; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Correa A; Mehran RJ; Rice D; Roth J; Vaporciyan A; Hofstetter WL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1146-50. PubMed ID: 22939861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
