214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21174097)
21. Characterization of indeterminate soft tissue masses referred for biopsy: What is the added value of contrast imaging at 3.0 tesla?
Del Grande F; Ahlawat S; Subhawong T; Fayad LM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):390-400. PubMed ID: 27417663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosis.
Zhang H; Zhang GF; He ZY; Li ZY; Zhang GX
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 289(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 23934242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: poor cost utility for treatment of adult patients with hip pain.
Keeney JA; Nunley RM; Adelani M; Mall N
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Mar; 472(3):787-92. PubMed ID: 24363186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diffusion MRI of uterine and ovarian masses: identifying the benign lesions.
Davarpanah AH; Kambadakone A; Holalkere NS; Guimaraes AR; Hahn PF; Lee SI
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2466-2475. PubMed ID: 27660280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Maternal Acute Adnexal Torsion during Pregnancy: Single-Institution Clinical Performance Review.
Lee JH; Roh HJ; Ahn JW; Kim JS; Choi JY; Lee SJ; Lee SH
J Clin Med; 2020 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32668570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses.
Huber S; Medl M; Baumann L; Czembirek H
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2501-7. PubMed ID: 12174952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characterization of malignancy of adnexal lesions using ADC entropy: comparison with mean ADC and qualitative DWI assessment.
Kierans AS; Bennett GL; Mussi TC; Babb JS; Rusinek H; Melamed J; Rosenkrantz AB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 37(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 23188749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adnexal masses in the premenopausal patient.
Hall TR; Randall TC
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 58(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 25608252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improve the diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of adnexal malignancy?
Dai SY; Hata K; Inubashiri E; Kanenishi K; Shiota A; Ohno M; Yamamoto Y; Nishiyama Y; Ohkawa M; Hata T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Jun; 34(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 18686352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Economic evaluation of an expert examiner and different ultrasound models in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Ramaekers BLT; Dirksen CD; Kooreman LFS; Slangen BFM; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Sep; 100():55-64. PubMed ID: 29957561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of sonographically indeterminate ovarian tumors with MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis.
Yamashita Y; Hatanaka Y; Torashima M; Takahashi M; Miyazaki K; Okamura H
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):572-7. PubMed ID: 9240680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.
Kim HJ; Lee SY; Shin YR; Park CS; Kim K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149465. PubMed ID: 26907919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contemporary Guidelines for Adnexal Mass Imaging: A 2020 Update.
Stein EB; Roseland ME; Shampain KL; Wasnik AP; Maturen KE
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 May; 46(5):2127-2139. PubMed ID: 33079254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Adusumilli S; Hussain HK; Caoili EM; Weadock WJ; Murray JP; Johnson TD; Chen Q; Desjardins B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 16928938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology.
Bazot M; Nassar-Slaba J; Thomassin-Naggara I; Cortez A; Uzan S; Daraï E
Eur Radiol; 2006 Dec; 16(12):2687-99. PubMed ID: 16547708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Borderline Ovarian Tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Imaging].
Abdel Wahab C; Rousset P; Bolze PA; Thomassin-Naggara I
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):260-276. PubMed ID: 32004779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
