These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21175018)

  • 1. Indirect bonding--do custom bases need a plastic conditioner? A randomised clinical trial.
    Miles P
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 21175018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study.
    Eslamian L; Ghassemi A; Amini F; Jafari A; Afrand M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 19193708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two indirect bonding adhesives.
    Miles PG; Weyant RJ
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1019-23. PubMed ID: 16448248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 19752016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of surface treatment on orthodontic bonding to amalgam.
    Skilton JW; Tyas MJ; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16792246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
    Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced-plastic bonded orthodontic retainers.
    Ardeshna AP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 21640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-component self-etching primer: a seventh generation of orthodontic bonding system?
    Pithon MM; dos Santos RL; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 20164128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to various esthetic pontic materials.
    Maryanchik I; Brendlinger EJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 20451789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonding of autopolymerizing acrylic resins to magnetic stainless steel alloys using metal conditioner.
    Shimizu H; Tsue F; Chen ZX; Kawaguchi T; Takahashi Y
    J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 18191011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of retention rates of brackets with thermally-cured and light-cured custom bases in indirect bonding procedures.
    Miles PG
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Jul; 16(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 11201964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Soliman MM; Oonsombat C; Laffoon JF; Warren J
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17373220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple and efficient procedure for indirect bonding.
    Cortesi R; Molinari L
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20974456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo effects of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets.
    Uysal T; Amasyali M; Ozcan S; Koyuturk AE; Akyol M; Sagdic D
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Sep; 55(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 20887516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets with new self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 20362914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are flowable resin-based composites a reliable material for metal orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Pick B; Rosa V; Azeredo TR; Cruz Filho EA; Miranda WG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20953560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.