BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21175292)

  • 1. Stem cell policy in the Obama age: UK and US perspectives.
    Matthews KR; Rowland ML
    Regen Med; 2011 Jan; 6(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21175292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expand and regularize federal funding for human pluripotent stem cell research.
    Owen-Smith J; Scott CT; McCormick JB
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2012; 31(3):714-22. PubMed ID: 22764380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Politics, culture, and the lab: public attitudes toward animals and human embryonic stem cells have fostered different research agendas in Britain and the United States.
    Borrego AM
    Chron High Educ; 2005 Mar; 51(27):A43-5. PubMed ID: 15835079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stem cells, science, and public reasoning.
    Hurlbut JB; Robert JS
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2012; 31(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 22764379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ups and downs of stem cell research: the impact of policy uncertainty.
    Marzotto T; Alt PM
    J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2012; 35(3):331-51. PubMed ID: 23293807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The public, political parties, and stem-cell research.
    Blendon RJ; Kim MK; Benson JM
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Nov; 365(20):1853-6. PubMed ID: 22087677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stem cell innovation in the USA: the benefits of the minimal state.
    Salter B; Harvey O
    Regen Med; 2008 Jul; 3(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 18588478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human embryonic stem cell research and Proposition 71. Reflections on California’s response to federal policy.
    Burgin E
    Politics Life Sci; 2010 Sep; 29(2):73-95. PubMed ID: 21761982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social media & stem cell science: examining the discourse.
    Adams A; Lomax G; Santarini A
    Regen Med; 2011 Nov; 6(6 Suppl):121-4. PubMed ID: 21999274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US science faces big chill.
    Semeniuk I; Wadman M; Samuel Reich E; Tollefson J
    Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7328):9-10. PubMed ID: 21209632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stem cell politics, ethics and medical progress.
    Annas GJ; Caplan A; Elias S
    Nat Med; 1999 Dec; 5(12):1339-41. PubMed ID: 10581063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Europe's ethical divide looms over biotech law and patents.
    Gaskell G; Stares S; Pottage A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2012 May; 30(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 22565959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. UK consults public on clones for research.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):523. PubMed ID: 9468125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rhetoric, power and legitimacy: a critical analysis of the public policy disputes surrounding stem cell research in Australia (2005-6).
    Lysaght T; Kerridge I
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Feb; 21(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 22586845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sudden death for a challenge to federal funding of stem-cell research.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Jun; 364(22):e47. PubMed ID: 21591936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How physicians and scientists can respond responsibly and effectively to religiously based opposition to human embryonic stem cell research.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2056-9. PubMed ID: 18178193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Representing the public in public engagement: the case of the 2008 UK Stem Cell Dialogue.
    Mohr A; Raman S
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(11):e1001418. PubMed ID: 23152719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Federal science policy. Changing battle lines, new fronts.
    Silberner J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(4):6. PubMed ID: 10451832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Embryonic stem cell research: will President Bush's limitation on federal funding put the United States at a disadvantage? A comparison between U.S. and international law.
    Stevens D
    Houst J Int Law; 2003; 25(3):623-53. PubMed ID: 15199940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.