BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21175374)

  • 1. Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration.
    Johnson S; Shaw R; Parkinson P; Ellis J; Buchanan P; Zinaman M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Feb; 27(2):393-401. PubMed ID: 21175374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How to date pregnancy?].
    Salomon LJ
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2011 Dec; 40(8):726-33. PubMed ID: 22056192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction of modern Australian first trimester ultrasound dating and growth charts.
    McLennan AC; Schluter PJ
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Oct; 52(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 19032393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self pregnancy testing in an urban family planning clinic: promising results for a new approach to contraceptive follow-up.
    Estes CM; Ramirez J; Tiezzi L; Westhoff C
    Contraception; 2008 Jan; 77(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 18082665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a home-based device for giving an early estimate of pregnancy duration compared with reference methods.
    Johnson SR; Godbert S; Perry P; Parsons P; Roberts L; Buchanan P; Larsen J; Alonzo TA; Zinaman M
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1635-41.e1. PubMed ID: 24074759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing bimanual pelvic examination to ultrasound measurement for assessment of gestational age in the first trimester of pregnancy.
    Nichols M; Morgan E; Jensen JT
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Oct; 47(10):825-8. PubMed ID: 12418065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of transcutaneous ultrasound over the right flank with transrectal ultrasound for pregnancy diagnosis in the dairy cow.
    Hunnam JC; Parkinson TJ; Lopez-Villalobos N; McDougall S
    Aust Vet J; 2009 Aug; 87(8):318-22. PubMed ID: 19673847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of routine ultrasound scan in pre-termination of pregnancy assessment in community setting.
    Singh M; Porter C; Johnson L
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jul; 28(5):508-10. PubMed ID: 18850425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
    Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
    Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of analytical sensitivity and women's interpretation of home pregnancy tests.
    Johnson S; Cushion M; Bond S; Godbert S; Pike J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 25274958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound femur length as a means of assessing gestational age amongst Nigerians.
    Osinusi BO
    West Afr J Med; 1990; 9(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 2268565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ultrasonic assessment of gestational age and prolonged pregnancy].
    Rasmussen S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Nov; 113(27):3366-8. PubMed ID: 8273064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis in swine by ultrasonography.
    Williams SI; Piñeyro P; de la Sota RL
    Can Vet J; 2008 Mar; 49(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18390099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: advantages and systematic errors.
    Källén K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 12493044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of accuracy and certainty of results of six home pregnancy tests available over-the-counter.
    Tomlinson C; Marshall J; Ellis JE
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Jun; 24(6):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18457603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilization of home pregnancy testing among women at risk for unintended pregnancy.
    Nettleman MD; Ayoola AB; Brewer JR
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 19589475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of women's, providers' and ultrasound assessments of pregnancy duration among termination of pregnancy clients in South Africa.
    Blanchard K; Cooper D; Dickson K; Cullingworth L; Mavimbela N; von Mollendorf C; van Bogaert LJ; Winikoff B
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 17439565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of volunteers' experience of using, and accuracy of reading, different types of home pregnancy test formats.
    Pike J; Godbert S; Johnson S
    Expert Opin Med Diagn; 2013 Sep; 7(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 23957730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of home pregnancy tests].
    Lindhard A; Schmidt L
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 May; 155(20):1550-3. PubMed ID: 8316987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.