These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21175714)

  • 1. Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility.
    Jenkins-Smith HC; Silva CL; Nowlin MC; deLozier G
    Risk Anal; 2011 Apr; 31(4):629-44. PubMed ID: 21175714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility.
    Chung JB; Kim HK; Rho SK
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):1021-32. PubMed ID: 18627537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental and health impacts of February 14, 2014 radiation release from the nation's only deep geologic nuclear waste repository.
    Thakur P; Lemons BG; Ballard S; Hardy R
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Aug; 146():6-15. PubMed ID: 25880461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source term estimation and the isotopic ratio of radioactive material released from the WIPP repository in New Mexico, USA.
    Thakur P
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 1():193-203. PubMed ID: 26492395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creating a baseline radiological standard for the waste isolation pilot plant underground.
    Chiou HC; Hayes R
    Isotopes Environ Health Stud; 2004 Sep; 40(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 15370285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance assessment in support of the 1996 compliance certification application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
    Helton JC; Anderson DR; Jow HN; Marietta MG; Basabilvazo G
    Risk Anal; 1999 Oct; 19(5):959-86; discussion 987-93. PubMed ID: 10765441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The magnitude and relevance of the February 2014 radiation release from the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant repository in New Mexico, USA.
    Thakur P; Lemons BG; White CR
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 565():1124-1137. PubMed ID: 27261427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An overview of EPA regulation of the safe disposal of transuranic waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
    Wolbarst AB; Forinash EK; Byrum CO; Peake RT; Marcinowski F; Kruger MU
    Health Phys; 2001 Feb; 80(2):110-25. PubMed ID: 11197458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Issues in establishing an aerosol radiological baseline for the waste isolation pilot plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico.
    Rodgers JC; Kenney JW
    Health Phys; 1997 Feb; 72(2):300-8. PubMed ID: 9003717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ongoing environmental monitoring and assessment of the long-term impacts of the February 2014 radiological release from the waste isolation pilot plant.
    Thakur P; Runyon T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(17):17038-17049. PubMed ID: 29633192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation release at the nation's only operating deep geological repository--an independent monitoring perspective.
    Thakur P; Ballard S; Hardy R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(21):12698-705. PubMed ID: 25313463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consequence Assessment of the WIPP Radiological Release from February 2014.
    Hayes RB
    Health Phys; 2016 Apr; 110(4):342-60. PubMed ID: 26910027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Logic and motivation in risk research: a nuclear waste test case.
    Brown RV
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):125-40. PubMed ID: 15787762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Citizen perceptions of risks associated with moving radiological waste.
    McBeth MK; Oakes AS
    Risk Anal; 1996 Jun; 16(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 8693166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Public input and sitting of a waste disposal facility: New York State's Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1986.
    Charnigo CA
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1989; 65(4):511-6. PubMed ID: 2819307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of public-interest group positions on radiation protection.
    Florig HK
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 17033464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residents' concerns and attitudes toward solid waste management facilities in Palestine: a case study of Hebron district.
    Al-Khatib IA; Ajlouny H; Al-Sari' MI; Kontogianni S
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Mar; 32(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 24522776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIMBY, CLAMP, and the location of new nuclear-related facilities: U.S. national and 11 site-specific surveys.
    Greenberg MR
    Risk Anal; 2009 Sep; 29(9):1242-54. PubMed ID: 19572962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Siting landfills and incinerators in areas of historic unpopularity: surveying the views of the next generation.
    Feo GD; Williams ID
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2798-810. PubMed ID: 24054780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plutonium Oxidation States in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Repository.
    Schramke JA; Santillan EFU; Peake RT
    Appl Geochem; 2020 May; 116():. PubMed ID: 32489229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.