These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21175958)

  • 1. How many patients do we need for a clinical trial? Demystifying sample size calculations.
    Kelly PJ; Webster AC; Craig JC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Dec; 15(8):725-31. PubMed ID: 21175958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.
    Noordzij M; Tripepi G; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Tanck MW; Jager KJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2010 May; 25(5):1388-93. PubMed ID: 20067907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many do I need? Basic principles of sample size estimation.
    Devane D; Begley CM; Clarke M
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Aug; 47(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 15238124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size calculations in surgery: are they done correctly?
    Maggard MA; O'Connell JB; Liu JH; Etzioni DA; Ko CY
    Surgery; 2003 Aug; 134(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 12947329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Release of data from an ongoing randomized clinical trial for sample size adjustment or planning.
    Freidlin B; Korn EL
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4074-82. PubMed ID: 17328095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient ways exist to obtain the optimal sample size in clinical trials in rare diseases.
    van der Lee JH; Wesseling J; Tanck MW; Offringa M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 18313556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal sample size determinations from an industry perspective based on the expected value of information.
    Willan AR
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 19029207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Funding, disease area, and internal validity of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
    Kjaergard LL; Gluud C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Nov; 97(11):2708-13. PubMed ID: 12425537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculations.
    Noordzij M; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2011; 118(4):c319-23. PubMed ID: 21293154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prevalence of underpowered randomized clinical trials in rheumatology.
    Keen HI; Pile K; Hill CL
    J Rheumatol; 2005 Nov; 32(11):2083-8. PubMed ID: 16265683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
    Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinded sample size reestimation in non-inferiority trials with binary endpoints.
    Friede T; Mitchell C; Müller-Velten G
    Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):903-16. PubMed ID: 17726715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining optimal sample sizes for multi-stage randomized clinical trials using value of information methods.
    Willan A; Kowgier M
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 18697843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Importance of realistic sample size calculations and why the next randomized trial needs to be large and multicentered.
    Li TS; Lee A; Joynt GM
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):675-6. PubMed ID: 17251734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 'number needed to sample' in primary care research. Comparison of two primary care sampling frames for chronic back pain.
    Smith BH; Hannaford PC; Elliott AM; Smith WC; Chambers WA
    Fam Pract; 2005 Apr; 22(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 15722397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
    Gluud LL; Sørensen TI; Gøtzsche PC; Gluud C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2431-5. PubMed ID: 16279896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias in clinical intervention research.
    Gluud LL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 16443796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Estimation of sample size in randomized controlled clinical trials--elimination of various systematic biases by the utilization of computer network system].
    Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1991 Jul; 18(9):1421-7. PubMed ID: 1830198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.