These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21176100)
1. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera® custom abutments and three implant systems. de Morais Alves da Cunha T; de Araújo RP; da Rocha PV; Amoedo RM Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):890-5. PubMed ID: 21176100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera custom abutments and three implant systems. Alves da Cunha Tde M; Correia de Araújo RP; Barbosa da Rocha PV; Pazos Amoedo RM Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 20977612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments. Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection. Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations. Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Procera abutment--the fifth generation abutment for dental implants. Kucey BK; Fraser DC J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Sep; 66(8):445-9. PubMed ID: 11040529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations. Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems. Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments. Yüzügüllü B; Avci M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment. Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments. Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading. Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap. Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation. Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept. Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading. Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]