These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21176250)

  • 1. [Statistical significance or clinical relevance?].
    Vanhoutte EK; Faber CG; Merkies IS
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A2516. PubMed ID: 21176250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confirming the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in CIDP through minimum clinically important differences: shifting from statistical significance to clinical relevance.
    Merkies IS; van Nes SI; Hanna K; Hughes RA; Deng C
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1194-9. PubMed ID: 20647554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
    Jaillon P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
    Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to perform a critical analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
    Estellat C; Torgerson DJ; Ravaud P
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 19393572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Trial end-point in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): minimal clinically important difference].
    Gillissen A; Buhl R; Kardos P; Puhan M; Rabe KF; Rothe T; Sauer R; Welte T; Worth H; Menz G
    Pneumologie; 2008 Mar; 62(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 18320495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can clinical trials requiring frequent participant contact be conducted over the Internet? Results from an online randomized controlled trial evaluating a topical ointment for herpes labialis.
    Formica M; Kabbara K; Clark R; McAlindon T
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Feb; 6(1):e6. PubMed ID: 15111272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting clinical trial results of patient-perceived onset of effect in asthma: methods and results of a Delphi panel.
    Harding G; Leidy NK; Meddis D; Kleinman L; Wagner S; O'Brien CD
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1563-71. PubMed ID: 19445651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of the minimum clinically important difference and its impact on designing a trial.
    Chuang-Stein C; Kirby S; Hirsch I; Atkinson G
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 20936625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The minimal clinically important difference in allergic rhinitis.
    Barnes ML; Vaidyanathan S; Williamson PA; Lipworth BJ
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2010 Feb; 40(2):242-50. PubMed ID: 19895590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How can we assess outcomes of clinical trials: the MCID approach.
    Make B
    COPD; 2007 Sep; 4(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 17729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [ The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].
    Labenz J; Kunz CJ
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 Jan; 108(1):73-83; quiz 84. PubMed ID: 21253744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The variability in minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state values did not have an impact on treatment effect estimates.
    Tubach F; Giraudeau B; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):725-8. PubMed ID: 19128938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.
    Replogle WH; Johnson WD
    Fam Med; 2007 Jun; 39(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 17549653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal clinically important differences in Incontinence Quality-of-Life scores in stress urinary incontinence.
    Yalcin I; Patrick DL; Summers K; Kinchen K; Bump RC
    Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1304-8. PubMed ID: 16750246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomised controlled trials in oncology closed early for benefit: trends in methodology, results, and interpretation.
    Booth CM; Ohorodnyk P; Zhu L; Tu D; Meyer RM
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Apr; 47(6):854-63. PubMed ID: 21296570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning From Major Clinical Trials: Bending Without Breaking.
    Pfeffer MA
    Circulation; 2017 Dec; 136(23):2207-2209. PubMed ID: 29203564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Realism in evidence based medicine: interpreting the randomised controlled trial.
    Connelly J
    J Health Organ Manag; 2004; 18(2-3):70-81. PubMed ID: 15366275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding randomised controlled trials.
    Akobeng AK
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):840-4. PubMed ID: 16040885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.