337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21177265)
1. Effect of fit testing on the protection offered by n95 filtering facepiece respirators against fine particles in a laboratory setting.
Reponen T; Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Johnson E; McKay R
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 21177265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protection factor for N95 filtering facepiece respirators exposed to laboratory aerosols containing different concentrations of nanoparticles.
Rengasamy S; Walbert G; Newcomb W; Coffey C; Wassell JT; Szalajda J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Apr; 59(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 25429023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles.
Balazy A; Toivola M; Reponen T; Podgórski A; Zimmer A; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16344291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Respiratory performance offered by N95 respirators and surgical masks: human subject evaluation with NaCl aerosol representing bacterial and viral particle size range.
Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 18326870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total inward leakage of nanoparticles through filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 21292731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 19261695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators against 4 to 30 nanometer-size nanoparticles.
Rengasamy S; King WP; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Sep; 5(9):556-64. PubMed ID: 18607812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanoparticle filtration performance of filtering facepiece respirators and canister/cartridge filters.
Rengasamy S; BerryAnn R; Szalajda J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(9):519-25. PubMed ID: 23927008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Respirator Performance against Nanoparticles under Simulated Workplace Activities.
Vo E; Zhuang Z; Horvatin M; Liu Y; He X; Rengasamy S
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Oct; 59(8):1012-21. PubMed ID: 26180261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory and field evaluation of a new personal sampling system for assessing the protection provided by the N95 filtering facepiece respirators against particles.
Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Li W; McKay R; Maynard A; Reponen T
Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Apr; 49(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 15668259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory faceseal leakage evaluation of n95 filtering facepiece respirators against nanoparticles and "all size" particles.
Zhuang Z; Bergman MS; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(9):496-504. PubMed ID: 23927376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Respiratory protection provided by N95 filtering facepiece respirators against airborne dust and microorganisms in agricultural farms.
Lee SA; Adhikari A; Grinshpun SA; McKay R; Shukla R; Zeigler HL; Reponen T
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Nov; 2(11):577-85. PubMed ID: 16234218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
