BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21177395)

  • 1. Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers.
    Liedenbaum MH; Bipat S; Bossuyt PM; Dwarkasing RS; de Haan MC; Jansen RJ; Kauffman D; van der Leij C; de Lijster MS; Lute CC; van der Paardt MP; Thomeer MG; Zijlstra IA; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 21177395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings.
    Baker ME; Bogoni L; Obuchowski NA; Dass C; Kendzierski RM; Remer EM; Einstein DM; Cathier P; Jerebko A; Lakare S; Blum A; Caroline DF; Macari M
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 17885187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers.
    Dachman AH; Kelly KB; Zintsmaster MP; Rana R; Khankari S; Novak JD; Ali AN; Qalbani A; Fletcher JG
    Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 18796675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.
    Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study.
    European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT Colonography Group Investigators
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 17185666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of radiographers in the evaluation of CT colonographic images.
    Jensch S; van Gelder RE; Florie J; Thomassen-de Graaf MA; Lobé JV; Bossuyt PM; Bipat S; Nio CY; Stoker J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):W249-55. PubMed ID: 17312031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.
    Sali L; Delsanto S; Sacchetto D; Correale L; Falchini M; Ferraris A; Gandini G; Grazzini G; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Morra L; Laghi A; Mascalchi M; Regge D
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4783-4791. PubMed ID: 29796918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
    Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Burling D; Morley S; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Jun; 14(6):1025-33. PubMed ID: 14872280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
    Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
    Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT colonography with computer-aided polyp detection: volume and attenuation thresholds to reduce false-positive findings owing to the ileocecal valve.
    O'Connor SD; Summers RM; Yao J; Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):426-32. PubMed ID: 17005773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ACRIN CT colonography trial: does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance?
    Hara AK; Blevins M; Chen MH; Dachman AH; Kuo MD; Menias CO; Siewert B; Cheema JI; Obregon RG; Fidler JL; Zimmerman P; Horton KM; Coakley KJ; Iyer RB; Halvorsen RA; Casola G; Yee J; Herman BA; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 21364081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography.
    Kim SH; Lee JM; Eun HW; Lee MW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 17709833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT colonography: false-negative interpretations.
    Doshi T; Rusinak D; Halvorsen RA; Rockey DC; Suzuki K; Dachman AH
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):165-73. PubMed ID: 17581901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
    Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography.
    Summers RM; Jerebko AK; Franaszek M; Malley JD; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):391-9. PubMed ID: 12409571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
    Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
    Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.
    Dachman AH; Obuchowski NA; Hoffmeister JW; Hinshaw JL; Frew MI; Winter TC; Van Uitert RL; Periaswamy S; Summers RM; Hillman BJ
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):827-35. PubMed ID: 20663975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.