BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21177422)

  • 1. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
    Xu Y
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
    Berry JH
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Greater frontal-parietal synchrony at low gamma-band frequencies for inefficient than efficient visual search in human EEG.
    Phillips S; Takeda Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 19481120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the category effect: the influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search.
    Smilek D; Dixon MJ; Merikle PM
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 16510131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Background, an important factor in visual search.
    De Vries JP; Hooge IT; Wertheim AH; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():128-38. PubMed ID: 23623804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priming by the mean representation of a set.
    Marchant AP; de Fockert JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1889-95. PubMed ID: 19418381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competition increases binding errors in visual working memory.
    Emrich SM; Ferber S
    J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 22523399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of distraction on visual enumeration in children and adults.
    Maylor EA; Watson DG; Hartley EL
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Sep; 47(5):1440-7. PubMed ID: 21744947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding.
    Reddy L; VanRullen R
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Serial correlations and 1/f power spectra in visual search reaction times.
    McIlhagga W
    J Vis; 2008 Jul; 8(9):5.1-14. PubMed ID: 18831641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An inter-item similarity model unifying feature and conjunction search.
    Phillips S; Takeda Y; Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3867-80. PubMed ID: 16920177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Odd-item search in pigeons: display size and transfer effects.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 2926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual search without attentional displacement.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):9.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.