BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21177422)

  • 21. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual search for item- and array-centered locations in patients with left middle cerebral artery stroke.
    Hildebrandt H; Schütze C; Ebke M; Brunner-Beeg F; Eling P
    Neurocase; 2005 Dec; 11(6):416-26. PubMed ID: 16393755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.
    Lamy D; Antebi C; Aviani N; Carmel T
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age and the ability to inhibit distractor information in visual selective attention.
    Kotary L; Hoyer WJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 7628509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search.
    van Zoest W; Donk M
    Perception; 2004; 33(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 15521692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.
    Wiegand I; Seidel C; Wolfe J
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):805-820. PubMed ID: 31414857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Priming in visual search: separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal.
    Kristjánsson A; Driver J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1217-32. PubMed ID: 18374961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.
    Wei P; Lü J; Müller HJ; Zhou X
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 185(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 17922117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of sequence and variety of irrelevant items on visual search.
    Marken R; Pettersen J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):315-8. PubMed ID: 503753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A search for search asymmetry in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Tomonaga M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1287-95. PubMed ID: 8337081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Temporal dissociation between category-based and item-based processes in rejecting distractors.
    Ariga A; Watanabe K
    Psychol Res; 2009 Jan; 73(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 18324414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual search: spatial frequency and orientation.
    Moraglia G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Oct; 69(2):675-89. PubMed ID: 2813016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli.
    Wolfe JM
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(9):1187-95. PubMed ID: 8184562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of Degraded distractors on (Nondegraded) target identification.
    Kritikos A; Pavlis A
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 17618425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search.
    Wolfe JM; Klempen NL; Shulman EP
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(12):2075-86. PubMed ID: 10343791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.