These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21177466)

  • 1. Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: analysis of alternative production systems.
    Sumner DA; Gow H; Hayes D; Matthews W; Norwood B; Rosen-Molina JT; Thurman W
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 21177466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sustainability of egg production in the United States--the policy and market context.
    Mench JA; Sumner DA; Rosen-Molina JT
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):229-40. PubMed ID: 21177465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survey of egg producers on the introduction of alternative housing systems for laying hens in Flanders, Belgium.
    Tuyttens FA; Sonck B; Staes M; Van Gansbeke S; Van den Bogaert T; Ampe B
    Poult Sci; 2011 Apr; 90(4):941-50. PubMed ID: 21406383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.
    Karcher DM; Jones DR; Abdo Z; Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 25630672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production.
    Matthews WA; Sumner DA
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):552-7. PubMed ID: 25480736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of furnished cages for laying hens.
    Appleby MC; Walker AW; Nicol CJ; Lindberg AC; Freire R; Hughes BO; Elson HA
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(4):489-500. PubMed ID: 12365505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply: A unique public-private partnership for conducting research on the sustainability of animal housing systems using a multistakeholder approach.
    Mench JA; Swanson JC; Arnot C
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):1296-308. PubMed ID: 27065290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Production costs and animal welfare for four stylized hog production systems.
    Seibert L; Norwood FB
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2011; 14(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 21191844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating production costs and retail prices in different poultry housing systems: conventional, enriched cage, aviary, and barn in Japan.
    Kato H; Shimizuike Y; Yasuda K; Yoshimatsu R; Yasuda KT; Imamura Y; Imai R
    Poult Sci; 2022 Dec; 101(12):102194. PubMed ID: 36274436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality.
    Holt PS; Davies RH; Dewulf J; Gast RK; Huwe JK; Jones DR; Waltman D; Willian KR
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):251-62. PubMed ID: 21177467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality.
    Guesdon V; Ahmed AM; Mallet S; Faure JM; Nys Y
    Br Poult Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16546790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of egg farmers regarding the ban on conventional cages in the EU and their opinion of alternative layer housing systems in Flanders, Belgium.
    Stadig LM; Ampe BA; Van Gansbeke S; Van den Bogaert T; D'Haenens E; Heerkens JL; Tuyttens FA
    Poult Sci; 2016 Mar; 95(3):715-25. PubMed ID: 26574025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems.
    Xin H; Gates RS; Green AR; Mitloehner FM; Moore PA; Wathes CM
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):263-77. PubMed ID: 21177468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens.
    Singh R; Cheng KM; Silversides FG
    Poult Sci; 2009 Feb; 88(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 19151338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer perceptions of egg-laying hen housing systems.
    Ochs DS; Wolf CA; Widmar NJO; Bir C
    Poult Sci; 2018 Oct; 97(10):3390-3396. PubMed ID: 29878239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bacteriological contamination, dirt, and cracks of eggshells in furnished cages and noncage systems for laying hens: an international on-farm comparison.
    De Reu K; Rodenburg TB; Grijspeerdt K; Messens W; Heyndrickx M; Tuyttens FA; Sonck B; Zoons J; Herman L
    Poult Sci; 2009 Nov; 88(11):2442-8. PubMed ID: 19834098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction--the Socially Sustainable Egg Production project.
    Swanson JC; Mench JA; Thompson PB
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):227-8. PubMed ID: 21177464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.
    Jones DR; Cox NA; Guard J; Fedorka-Cray PJ; Buhr RJ; Gast RK; Abdo Z; Rigsby LL; Plumblee JR; Karcher DM; Robison CI; Blatchford RA; Makagon MM
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 25480737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Cracking" into the debate about laying hen housing.
    Bir C; Thompson NM; Tyner WE; Hu J; Widmar NJO
    Poult Sci; 2018 May; 97(5):1595-1604. PubMed ID: 29462486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of edible environmental enrichments during the rearing and laying periods in a littered aviary-Part 2: physical development of pullets and performance, egg quality, and carcass composition in laying hens.
    Schreiter R; Damme K; Klunker M; Raoult C; von Borell E; Freick M
    Poult Sci; 2020 Dec; 99(12):6685-6696. PubMed ID: 33248584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.