These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21177468)

  • 1. Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems.
    Xin H; Gates RS; Green AR; Mitloehner FM; Moore PA; Wathes CM
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):263-77. PubMed ID: 21177468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions.
    Shepherd TA; Zhao Y; Li H; Stinn JP; Hayes MD; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 25737568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality.
    Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Li H; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):518-33. PubMed ID: 25737567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nutrient flow and distribution in conventional cage, enriched colony, and aviary layer houses.
    Lin XJ; Zhang R; Jiang S; Elmashad HM; Mitloehner F
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jan; 95(1):213-24. PubMed ID: 26628346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems - Part III: Airborne bacteria concentrations and emissions.
    Zhao Y; Zhao D; Ma H; Liu K; Atilgan A; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jul; 95(7):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 26994201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: analysis of alternative production systems.
    Sumner DA; Gow H; Hayes D; Matthews W; Norwood B; Rosen-Molina JT; Thurman W
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 21177466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.
    Karcher DM; Jones DR; Abdo Z; Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 25630672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.
    Jones DR; Cox NA; Guard J; Fedorka-Cray PJ; Buhr RJ; Gast RK; Abdo Z; Rigsby LL; Plumblee JR; Karcher DM; Robison CI; Blatchford RA; Makagon MM
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 25480737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sustainability of egg production in the United States--the policy and market context.
    Mench JA; Sumner DA; Rosen-Molina JT
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):229-40. PubMed ID: 21177465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ammonia emissions, impacts, and mitigation strategies for poultry production: A critical review.
    Bist RB; Subedi S; Chai L; Yang X
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 328():116919. PubMed ID: 36516703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: egg production systems.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG; Wiseman J; Guy J; Kyriazakis I
    Poult Sci; 2012 Jan; 91(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 22184425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of litter floor access and inclusion of experienced hens in aviary housing on floor eggs, litter condition, air quality, and hen welfare.
    Oliveira JL; Xin H; Chai L; Millman ST
    Poult Sci; 2019 Apr; 98(4):1664-1677. PubMed ID: 30535034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of three egg production systems: Housing characteristics and management practices.
    Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Swanson JC; Mench JA; Karcher DM; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 25737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hen genetic strain and extended cold storage influence on physical egg quality from cage-free aviary housing system.
    Jones DR; Karcher DM; Regmi P; Robison CO; Gast RK
    Poult Sci; 2018 Jul; 97(7):2347-2355. PubMed ID: 29617856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevention and control of losses of gaseous nitrogen compounds in livestock operations: a review.
    Jongebreur AA; Monteny GJ
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2001 Nov; 1 Suppl 2():844-51. PubMed ID: 12805834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing ammonia emissions from laying-hen houses through dietary manipulation.
    Li H; Xin H; Burns RT; Roberts SA; Li S; Kliebenstein J; Bregendahl K
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 22442932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bacteriological contamination, dirt, and cracks of eggshells in furnished cages and noncage systems for laying hens: an international on-farm comparison.
    De Reu K; Rodenburg TB; Grijspeerdt K; Messens W; Heyndrickx M; Tuyttens FA; Sonck B; Zoons J; Herman L
    Poult Sci; 2009 Nov; 88(11):2442-8. PubMed ID: 19834098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of a commercial housing system on egg quality during extended storage.
    Jones DR; Karcher DM; Abdo Z
    Poult Sci; 2014 May; 93(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 24795324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of two different broiler flooring systems on production performances, welfare, and environment under commercial production conditions.
    Li H; Wen X; Alphin R; Zhu Z; Zhou Z
    Poult Sci; 2017 May; 96(5):1108-1119. PubMed ID: 28339976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality.
    Holt PS; Davies RH; Dewulf J; Gast RK; Huwe JK; Jones DR; Waltman D; Willian KR
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):251-62. PubMed ID: 21177467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.