These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations. Andriole KP J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost? Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artifacts in digital radiography. Walz-Flannigan A; Magnuson D; Erickson D; Schueler B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jan; 198(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 22194492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique. Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts. Hammerstrom K; Aldrich J; Alves L; Ho A J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):226-39. PubMed ID: 16710796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system. Morin RL; Seibert JA J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Artifacts in digital mammography. Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers. Cesar LJ Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 9008016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Digital imaging system are rapidly introduced in Swedish departments of radiography. This calls for new strategic planning]. Laurin S; Norberg KA Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(41):4600-1. PubMed ID: 11107746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition. Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography. Willis CE J Digit Imaging; 2007 Mar; 20(1):1-3; author reply 4-5. PubMed ID: 17410404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display. Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ; J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR. Neitzel U Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artifacts found during quality assurance testing of computed radiography and digital radiography detectors. Honey ID; Mackenzie A J Digit Imaging; 2009 Aug; 22(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18427900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]