These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21178029)

  • 1. Computed radiography image artifacts revisited.
    Shetty CM; Barthur A; Kambadakone A; Narayanan N; Kv R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):W37-47. PubMed ID: 21178029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
    Fasbender R; Schaetzing R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artefacts found in computed radiography.
    Cesar LJ; Schueler BA; Zink FE; Daly TR; Taubel JP; Jorgenson LL
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):195-202. PubMed ID: 11718396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost?
    Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artifacts in digital radiography.
    Walz-Flannigan A; Magnuson D; Erickson D; Schueler B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jan; 198(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 22194492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts.
    Hammerstrom K; Aldrich J; Alves L; Ho A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):226-39. PubMed ID: 16710796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system.
    Morin RL; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers.
    Cesar LJ
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 9008016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital imaging system are rapidly introduced in Swedish departments of radiography. This calls for new strategic planning].
    Laurin S; Norberg KA
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(41):4600-1. PubMed ID: 11107746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Willis CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Mar; 20(1):1-3; author reply 4-5. PubMed ID: 17410404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
    Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artifacts found during quality assurance testing of computed radiography and digital radiography detectors.
    Honey ID; Mackenzie A
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Aug; 22(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18427900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.