504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21178068)
1. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Satake H; Nishio A; Ikeda M; Ishigaki S; Shimamoto K; Hirano M; Naganawa S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 21178068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subcategorization of Suspicious Breast Lesions (BI-RADS Category 4) According to MRI Criteria: Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Maltez de Almeida JR; Gomes AB; Barros TP; Fahel PE; de Seixas Rocha M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):222-31. PubMed ID: 26102403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography for management of BI-RADS category 4 nonpalpable breast masses.
Niu Q; Zhao L; Wang R; Du L; Shi Q; Jia C; Li G; Jin L; Li F
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111391. PubMed ID: 38422608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Heer I; Schaefer PJ; Mundhenke C; Osterholz S; Order BM; Hofheinz N; Hedderich J; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 19773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporating diffusion-weighted imaging in a diagnostic algorithm for multiparametric MR mammography.
Vassiou K; Fanariotis M; Tsougos I; Fezoulidis I
Acta Radiol; 2022 Oct; 63(10):1332-1343. PubMed ID: 34605311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ShearWave™ Elastography BE1 multinational breast study: additional SWE™ features support potential to downgrade BI-RADS®-3 lesions.
Schäfer FK; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Hahne U; Madjar H; Svensson WE; Balu-Maestro C; Juhan V; Athanasiou A; Mundinger A; Order B; Locatelli M; Cosgrove D; Wolf OJ; Henry JP; Moutfi M; Gay JM; Cohen-Bacrie C
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun; 34(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 23709241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical application of qualitative assessment for breast masses in shear-wave elastography.
Gweon HM; Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e680-5. PubMed ID: 23988689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Ou B; Zhong WJ; Zhao ZZ; Zhao XB; Yang HY; Luo BM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 22608397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Value of Lesion Size as an Adjunct to the BI-RADS-MRI 2013 Descriptors in the Diagnosis of Solitary Breast Masses.
Kawai M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Iima M; Onishi N; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 29213007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Park SH; Chang JM; Jang M; Kim KG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1460-5. PubMed ID: 21098210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification.
Evans A; Whelehan P; Thomson K; Brauer K; Jordan L; Purdie C; McLean D; Baker L; Vinnicombe S; Thompson A
Br J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 107(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22691969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative DWI implemented after DCE-MRI yields increased specificity for BI-RADS 3 and 4 breast lesions.
Dijkstra H; Dorrius MD; Wielema M; Pijnappel RM; Oudkerk M; Sijens PE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1642-1649. PubMed ID: 27273694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of breast mass morphology with diffusion-weighted MRI: Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient.
Kul S; Metin Y; Kul M; Metin N; Eyuboglu I; Ozdemir O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1668-1677. PubMed ID: 29734493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
