372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21178633)
21. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users.
Hodges AV; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Balkany TJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 7917192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
Mens LH; Berenstein CK
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: Psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements.
Macherey O; Stahl P; Intartaglia B; Meunier S; Roman S; Schön D
Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108176. PubMed ID: 33524792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds.
Smith DW; Finley CC; van den Honert C; Olszyk VB; Konrad KE
Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 7737916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants.
Wang Z; Liu Y; Wang L; Shen X; Han S; Wang W; Gao F; Liang W; Peng KA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():98-103. PubMed ID: 29287891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.
Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing PR; Sommer A; Kuzma J; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 10733186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults.
Brown CJ; Hughes ML; Luk B; Abbas PJ; Wolaver A; Gervais J
Ear Hear; 2000 Apr; 21(2):151-63. PubMed ID: 10777022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of stimulation parameters on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
Tavartkiladze GA; Potalova LA; Kruglov AV; Belov A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 11603775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Postoperative objective detecting techniques for cochlear implant children with inner ear malformation.
Qiao XF; Li X; Zhang QW; Li TL; Wang D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():1-6. PubMed ID: 29106852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.
Berenstein CK; Vanpoucke FJ; Mulder JJ; Mens LH
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 20946945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Deniz B; Kara E; Polat Z; Deniz R; Ataş A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
