257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21178838)
1. Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
Quan GM; Vital JM; Hansen S; Pointillart V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(8):639-46. PubMed ID: 21178838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Cervical Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in China.
Zhao Y; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Pan S; Zhou F; Liu Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 26751058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.
Heidecke V; Burkert W; Brucke M; Rainov NG
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2008 May; 150(5):453-9; discussion 459. PubMed ID: 18421412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.
Kim SW; Paik SH; Castro PA; Baek SW; Shin DJ; Kwak YH; Ju YS
Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 20537960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single- and multiple-level.
Yang S; Wu X; Hu Y; Li J; Liu G; Xu W; Yang C; Ye S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):E371-7. PubMed ID: 18496332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level.
Goffin J; Van Calenbergh F; van Loon J; Casey A; Kehr P; Liebig K; Lind B; Logroscino C; Sgrambiglia R; Pointillart V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(24):2673-8. PubMed ID: 14673368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass.
Jin YJ; Park SB; Kim MJ; Kim KJ; Kim HJ
Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):408-20. PubMed ID: 23332520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices.
Ryu KS; Park CK; Jun SC; Huh HY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 20809721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The application of cervical spine arthroplasty with Bryan disc and mid-term clinical and radiological follow-up results].
Sun Y; Zhao YB; Zhou FF; Liu ZJ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 18785526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Lei T; Liu Y; Wang H; Xu J; Ma Q; Wang L; Shen Y
Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 26744166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The intermediate clinical outcome and its limitations of Bryan cervical arthroplasty for treatment of cervical disc herniation.
Ren X; Wang W; Chu T; Wang J; Li C; Jiang T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):221-9. PubMed ID: 20634725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Hipp JA; Wharton ND; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):991-6. PubMed ID: 21358477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc: long-term X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up results.
Zhao YB; Sun Y; Chen ZQ; Liu ZJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Nov; 123(21):2999-3002. PubMed ID: 21162945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
Xu JX; Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Ding WY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19404176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.
Pointillart V; Castelain JE; Coudert P; Cawley DT; Gille O; Vital JM
Int Orthop; 2018 Apr; 42(4):851-857. PubMed ID: 29288377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.
Powell JW; Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA; Hipp JA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20051921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.
Goffin J; Casey A; Kehr P; Liebig K; Lind B; Logroscino C; Pointillart V; Van Calenbergh F; van Loon J
Neurosurgery; 2002 Sep; 51(3):840-5; discussion 845-7. PubMed ID: 12188968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
