293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21178845)
1. Comparison of the kinematic features between the in vivo active and passive flexion-extension of the subaxial cervical spine and their biomechanical implications.
Hsu WH; Chen YL; Lui TN; Chen TY; Hsu YH; Lin CL; Ming-Lun T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(8):630-8. PubMed ID: 21178845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Compensatory Relationship of Upper and Subaxial Cervical Motion in the Presence of Cervical Spondylosis.
Hayashi T; Daubs MD; Suzuki A; Scott TP; Phan K; Aghdasi B; Ruangchainikom M; Hu X; Lee C; Takahashi S; Shiba K; Wang JC
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 May; 29(4):E196-200. PubMed ID: 24077413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo analysis of cervical range of motion after 4- and 5-level subaxial cervical spine fusion.
Bechara BP; Bell KM; Hartman RA; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):E23-9. PubMed ID: 21508893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of cervical kyphotic deformity type on the motion characteristics and dynamic spinal cord compression.
Ruangchainikom M; Daubs MD; Suzuki A; Hayashi T; Weintraub G; Lee CJ; Inoue H; Tian H; Aghdasi B; Scott TP; Phan KH; Chotivichit A; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):932-8. PubMed ID: 24718067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [IN VIVO THREE-DIMENSIONAL TRANSIENT MOTION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE IN HEALTHY ADULTS].
Li H; Xia Q; Bai J; Miao J; Liu J; Wei D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1494-9. PubMed ID: 27044217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics of Cervical Spine Motion in Different Types of Cervical Alignment: Kinematic MRI Study.
Sessumpun K; Paholpak P; Hindoyan KN; Tamai K; Sangkomkamhang T; Buser Z; Wang JC
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 May; 31(4):E239-E244. PubMed ID: 29315118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis.
Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Fujii R; Nakajima Y; Tamura S; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2826-31. PubMed ID: 15599286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo evaluation of dynamic characteristics of the normal, fused, and disc replacement cervical spines.
Liu F; Cheng J; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR; Sharma A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2578-84. PubMed ID: 17978657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Study of Cobb Angular Velocity in Cervical Spine during Dynamic Extension-Flexion.
Ren D; Hu Z; Yuan W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E410-5. PubMed ID: 26583468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical flexion and extension includes anti-directional cervical joint motion in healthy adults.
Wang X; Lindstroem R; Plocharski M; Østergaaard LR; Graven-Nielsen T
Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):147-154. PubMed ID: 28735768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical aspects of the subarachnoid space and cervical cord in healthy individuals examined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging.
Muhle C; Wiskirchen J; Weinert D; Falliner A; Wesner F; Brinkmann G; Heller M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(5):556-67. PubMed ID: 9530787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine during seated axial rotation and lateral bending via a fluoroscopy-to-CT registration approach.
Lin CC; Lu TW; Wang TM; Hsu CY; Hsu SJ; Shih TF
J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3310-7. PubMed ID: 25218506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo cervical facet joint capsule deformation during flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):E514-20. PubMed ID: 24480943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subaxial Cervical Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Kinematics Following Atlantoaxial Fixation in Different Angles.
Liu Q; Guo Q; Yang J; Zhang P; Xu T; Cheng X; Chen J; Guan H; Ni B
World Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 87():521-8. PubMed ID: 26409072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
Ivancic PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
