293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21178845)
21. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.
Suk KS; Kim KT; Lee JH; Lee SH; Lim YJ; Kim JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):E656-60. PubMed ID: 17978640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cervical disc prostheses need a variable center of rotation for flexion / extension below disc level, plus a separate COR for lateral bending above disc level to more closely replicate in-vivo motion: MRI-based biomechanical in-vivo study.
Muhlbauer MK; Tomasch E; Sinz W; Trattnig S; Steffan H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Mar; 23(1):227. PubMed ID: 35260131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sacroiliac joint motion in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders.
Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sakaura H; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 25978076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital tracking algorithm reveals the influence of structural irregularities on joint movements in the human cervical spine.
Balkovec C; Veldhuis J; Baird JW; Wayne Brodland G; McGill SM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jul; 56():11-17. PubMed ID: 29738991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical significance of cervical vertebral flexion and extension spatial alignment changes.
Xu-hui Z; Jia-hu F; Lian-shun J; Zhi-yong C; Yong Z; Xiong-sheng C; Wei-ping W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E21-6. PubMed ID: 19127144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Kinematic analysis of cervical spine canal diameter and its association with grade of degeneration.
Jiang X; Chen D; Lou Y; Li Z
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2166-72. PubMed ID: 27236657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intervertebral range of motion characteristics of normal cervical spinal segments (C0-T1) during in vivo neck motions.
Zhou C; Wang H; Wang C; Tsai TY; Yu Y; Ostergaard P; Li G; Cha T
J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109418. PubMed ID: 31653508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Recurrent neck pain patients exhibit altered joint motion pattern during cervical flexion and extension movements.
Qu N; Graven-Nielsen T; Lindstrøm R; Blogg Andersen Dc V; Hirata RP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():125-132. PubMed ID: 31726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dynamic Evaluation of the Cervical Spine and the Spinal Cord of Symptomatic Patients Using a Kinetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique.
Xiong C; Daubs MD; Scott TP; Phan KH; Suzuki A; Ruangchainikom M; Roe AK; Aghdasi B; Tan Y; Wang JC
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1149-E1155. PubMed ID: 27681536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Kinematics of the Cervical Spine Under Healthy and Degenerative Conditions: A Systematic Review.
Lindenmann S; Tsagkaris C; Farshad M; Widmer J
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1705-1733. PubMed ID: 36496482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT imaging techniques for describing motions of the cervicothoracic junction and cervical spine during flexion, extension, and cervical traction.
Simon S; Davis M; Odhner D; Udupa J; Winkelstein B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jan; 31(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 16395175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Kinematic relationship between missed ligamentum flavum bulge and degenerative factors in the cervical spine.
Zhong G; Buser Z; Lao L; Yin R; Wang JC
Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2216-21. PubMed ID: 26096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Locating the Instant Center of Rotation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine with Biplanar Fluoroscopy during
Kim SH; Ham DW; Lee JI; Park SW; Ko MJ; Koo SB; Song KS
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Dec; 11(4):482-489. PubMed ID: 31788173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
