These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

861 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21180003)

  • 1. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of salivary contamination on microleakage of resin composites placed with a self-etch adhesive in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
    Fakhri M; Seraj B; Shahrabi M; Motahhary P; Hooshmand T
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 19722444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage in resin composite restorations after antimicrobial pre-treatments: effect of KTP laser, chlorhexidine gluconate and Clearfil Protect Bond.
    Siso HS; Kustarci A; Göktolga EG
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 19544822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study.
    Chandra PV; Harikumar V; Ramkiran D; Krishna MJ; Gouda MV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23579893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cavity varnish, amalgam liner or dentin bonding agents on the marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Belli S; Unlü N; Ozer F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 May; 28(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 11380791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and microleakage.
    Ozer F; Unlü N; Oztürk B; Sengun A
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 11931139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
    Ozel E; Soyman M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.