These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21180834)

  • 1. [Evaluation of the cost of treating pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients using industrialized dressings].
    Lima AC; Guerra DM
    Cien Saude Colet; 2011 Jan; 16(1):267-77. PubMed ID: 21180834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct cost of dressings for pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients.
    Lima AF; Castilho V; Baptista CM; Rogenski NM; Rogenski KE
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2016; 69(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 27280565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic evaluation of the treatment of chronic wounds: hydroactive wound dressings in combination with enzymatic ointment versus gauze dressings in patients with pressure ulcer and venous leg ulcer in Germany.
    Bergemann R; Lauterbach KW; Vanscheidt W; Neander KD; Engst R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1999 Oct; 16(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 10623365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost comparison of pressure ulcer preventive dressings: hydrocolloid dressing versus transparent polyurethane film.
    Dutra RA; Salomé GM; Leal LM; Alves MG; Moura JP; Silva AT; Pereira VO; de Brito MJ; Ferreira LM
    J Wound Care; 2016 Nov; 25(11):635-640. PubMed ID: 27827275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economics of pressure-ulcer care: review of the literature on modern versus traditional dressings.
    San Miguel L; Torra i Bou JE; Verdú Soriano J
    J Wound Care; 2007 Jan; 16(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17334139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Major costs associated with pressure sores.
    Javitz HS; Ward MM; Martens L
    J Wound Care; 1998 Jun; 7(6):286-90. PubMed ID: 9697461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cost of healing pressure ulcers across multiple health care settings.
    Xakellis GC; Frantz R
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(6):18-22. PubMed ID: 9069752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-of-illness studies in chronic ulcers: a systematic review.
    Chan B; Cadarette S; Wodchis W; Wong J; Mittmann N; Krahn M
    J Wound Care; 2017 Apr; 26(sup4):S4-S14. PubMed ID: 28379102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing.
    Waycaster C; Milne CT
    J Med Econ; 2013 Jul; 16(7):976-86. PubMed ID: 23701261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An estimate of the potential budget impact of using prophylactic dressings to prevent hospital-acquired PUs in Australia.
    Santamaria N; Santamaria H
    J Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 23(11):583-4, 586, 588-9. PubMed ID: 25375406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical study using activity-based costing to assess cost-effectiveness of a wound management system utilizing modern dressings in comparison with traditional wound care].
    Ohura T; Sanada H; Mino Y
    Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 41(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 14999922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pressure ulcer management in home health care: efficacy and cost effectiveness of moisture vapor permeable dressing.
    Sebern MD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Oct; 67(10):726-9. PubMed ID: 3533007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of Hydrocolloid Dressings in Preventing Pressure Ulcers in High-risk Patients: a Retrospective Cohort.
    Cortés OL; Salazar-Beltrán LD; Rojas-Castañeda YA; Alvarado-Muriel A; Serna-Restrepo A; Grinspun D
    Invest Educ Enferm; 2018 Feb; 36(1):e11. PubMed ID: 29898350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in a community hospital setting: the role of total score and individual subscale scores in triggering preventive interventions.
    Gadd MM; Morris SM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(6):535-8. PubMed ID: 25377103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound healing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers.
    Souliotis K; Kalemikerakis I; Saridi M; Papageorgiou M; Kalokerinou A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2016 May; 24(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 27037729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure ulcer prevalence and the role of negative pressure wound therapy in home health quality outcomes.
    Schwien T; Gilbert J; Lang C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Sep; 51(9):47-60. PubMed ID: 16230764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost of dressings for prevention of sacral pressure ulcers.
    Inoue KC; Matsuda LM
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2016; 69(4):641-5. PubMed ID: 27508467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cost-effectiveness of wound management protocols of care.
    Harding K; Cutting K; Price P
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Oct; 9(19 Suppl):S6, S8, S10 passim. PubMed ID: 12271239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effective pressure ulcer management in extended care.
    Erwin-Toth P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Aug; 41(7A Suppl):64S-68S; discussion 69S. PubMed ID: 7669201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pressure ulcers management: an economic evaluation.
    Foglia E; Restelli U; Napoletano AM; Coclite D; Porazzi E; Bonfanti M; Croce D
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2012 Mar; 53(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 22803317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.