These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21182105)

  • 1. Charts to assess fetal wellbeing.
    Rasmussen S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 21182105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Growth charts of fetal biometry: a longitudinal study.
    Munim S; Morris T; Baber N; Ansari Y; Azam SI
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jun; 25(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 21819339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique.
    Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 20052663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Ultrasonographic fetal biometry charts in Niger].
    Vangeenderhuysen C; Nono M
    Med Trop (Mars); 1998; 58(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 10399699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal Biometry in the Israeli Population: New Reference Charts.
    Daniel-Spiegel E; Mandel M; Nevo D; Ben-Chetrit A; Shen O; Shalev E; Yagel S
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2016 Jan; 18(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 26964279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender- and parity-specific reference charts for fetal size in low risk singleton pregnancies at the onset of the third trimester.
    De Reu P; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Snijders RJ; De Reu-Cuppens MJ; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 17313311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Z-scores to compare biometry data obtained during prenatal ultrasound screening by midwives and physicians.
    Capmas P; Salomon LJ; Picone O; Fuchs F; Frydman R; Senat MV
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Jan; 30(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19960449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
    Neufeld LM; Wagatsuma Y; Hussain R; Begum M; Frongillo EA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal biometry to assess the size and growth of the fetus.
    O'Gorman N; Salomon LJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 May; 49():3-15. PubMed ID: 29605157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biometric assessment.
    Kiserud T; Johnsen SL
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):819-31. PubMed ID: 19632901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Dorion A; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic biophysical measurements in the normal human fetus for optimal design of the monolithic fetal pacemaker.
    Fayn E; Chou HA; Park D; Zavitz DH; Cuneo BF; Mahan VL; Guleçyuz M; Curran L; Lipson D; Quillen EW; Petrikovsky BM; Ovadia M
    Am J Cardiol; 2005 May; 95(10):1267-70. PubMed ID: 15878011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Small for gestational age is not a diagnosis.
    Soothill PW; Bobrow CS; Holmes R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 13(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 10341397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RE: Ultrasound and fetal size measurements in Brisbane, Australia.
    Mongelli M; Benzie R
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Oct; 49(5):441. PubMed ID: 16174192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal biometry at 4300 m compared to sea level in Peru.
    Krampl E; Lees C; Bland JM; Espinoza Dorado J; Moscoso G; Campbell S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 16(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 11084959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The value of current echographic parameters in fetal biometry].
    Sussmann M; Curie P; Dreyfus M; Renaud R
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1985 May; 80(6):415-22. PubMed ID: 3895364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.